Walker Wildmon: Welcome to At the Core here on American Family Radio. Walker Wildmon here with you. Glad to be with you on this edition of the program. The show is hosted each week by myself and my good friend Rick Green, America's Constitution Coach. He and I rotate throughout the week, and we're glad to have you here on the American Family Radio Network. Walker Wildmon: We've got a jam-packed show and a lot to talk about in the news. The one thing that I want to make sure we get to today is what America is facing when we talk about the Democrat Party. What are the type of people that we're dealing with as a country when it comes to the Democrat Party? Walker Wildmon: This is obviously midterm election season. The midterm election is on Tuesday, November 3. You need to vote, vote, vote and be educated by using iVoterGuide.com, America's most conservative, expansive, and comprehensive voter guide. Go there, key in your voting address, and have your personalized ballot pulled up. Walker Wildmon: As we head into the midterms, and of course every year there are certain elections around the country, and in 2028 we'll have a presidential election, we need to know what the parties represent and the type of people running the parties. That's what we're going to spend at least most of our time on today, and we'll talk about other things as well. Walker Wildmon: Jumping into the content for today, I came across this clip from Michael Knowles. He was on the Piers Morgan show with an LGBTQ activist and someone who actually is a self-professed homosexual. They were having this debate about homosexuality, whether it's natural or unnatural, and why people are against it. It was a very fascinating conversation and debate. Walker Wildmon: The original clip ran about five minutes. I summarized it down to this core issue of discussing how homosexuality is unnatural. This is a debate on Piers Morgan's show. Piers Morgan is rather liberal, but it was a pretty good conversation and debate, even though Michael Knowles kept getting interrupted persistently. Walker Wildmon: I want you to pay attention to two things. The first thing I want you to pay attention to is how the homosexual activist uses animal comparisons to talk about human behavior. That's the first red flag because, per God's created order, scientific evidence, natural law, and the Bible, humans are not animals. We are distinctly different from every other created being in that we have a conscience. We have a soul that animals do not. Walker Wildmon: The second is how quickly this homosexual activist shifts the conversation away from the core debate of natural versus unnatural behavior, then begins name-calling and drops unproven allegations against Michael Knowles. Listen to this fascinating conversation. Piers Morgan: Why is it not okay for men to marry men and women to marry women? Michael Knowles: Because it's like asking, why can't a circle be a square? It just isn't. Piers Morgan: Well, that doesn't make any sense. That's not an answer to my question. Why do you believe that that isn't okay? Michael Knowles: Because marriage, in its nature, is the union between a man and a woman for the purpose of procreation. Piers Morgan: According to marriage? According to what it is? According to the Bible? Michael Knowles: No, according to nature. Activist: Right. Insane. Michael Knowles: According to nature. Activist: What are you talking about, according to nature? We've seen in nature that there are gay animals, right? Michael Knowles: Yeah, that's not marriage. They're not married. Activist: No, because marriage is what? It's a social construct. Michael Knowles: It's a natural construct. Piers Morgan: Do you accept that, as you just quite rightly pointed out, animals don't get married? Michael Knowles: I'm about to say something you might agree with. Piers Morgan: Shut up a minute, right? Do you accept that his proclivity to having sex with other men is a natural thing? Activist: But it's also love. I want to make that distinction. Piers Morgan: And love. Michael Knowles: I think there are all sorts of weird deviations and aberrations that come out. Activist: That's not an okay word to use. Piers Morgan: But if it's natural, why is it deviant? Michael Knowles: Because we mean natural in two different ways. We mean natural as things that just happen. Animals will kill each other and eat each other. Cannibalism is natural, I guess, in that way. We also mean natural as man's participation in the moral law, in the eternal law. You say, look, maybe cannibalism is natural in a certain sense, but really it's totally contrary to the natural law. It's not good for human beings, so we shouldn't do it. I say marriage is a natural institution. Piers Morgan: But you think he's a deviant for being gay? Michael Knowles: Yeah, a little bit. Activist: But that's a little opinion of it. The thing is, people who are homophobic, which you are being a little bit right now, are always closeted gay men afraid of their own feelings. Michael Knowles: Hold on. Activist: The research says it. Michael Knowles: Wait a second. What I think is happening here is... Activist: You are afraid of your own closeted homosexual feelings. That's why you're saying it's not natural. Michael Knowles: You know what's amazing about that rejoinder, which I always hear, is that if you express the view of homosexuality held by Christians, religious Jews, Muslims, and perfectly ordinary people, notice what the really pro-LGBT activists will always say. The very first thing they'll do to insult you is say, "Well, actually, you're secretly gay." Activist: I wasn't even using it as an insult. You're the one using it as an insult. Walker Wildmon: Folks, this is why the left can't debate us. By the way, kudos to Michael Knowles for not bending the knee here. When Piers Morgan said, "Do you think he's a deviant?" Michael Knowles said, "Yeah, somewhat of a deviant." Good for him. Walker Wildmon: Often, the pressure regarding viewpoints and convictions on human sexuality is intense. People succumb to it every day. "Oh, let's just be nice." Well, I don't know where in the Bible it says to be nice. If you're talking about being kind to others and loving others, being kind and loving is telling people the truth. You can tell people the truth with compassion and understanding, and you don't have to be overly provocative or offensive. Walker Wildmon: But folks, the Bible in and of itself is offensive to some. The Bible is offensive to people who are hostile to Christianity and biblical truth. They don't like it. They hate it. We can't water the Bible down. We can't nice our way out of these debates. Winning everybody over is fairy-tale land. That is actually unbiblical. Walker Wildmon: Kudos to Michael Knowles for not trying to nice his way out of this debate. He says, no, this is deviant behavior. As a result, if you are engaging in sex between two men, which is sodomy, then that is deviant behavior and you are a deviant. That's a hard truth, and people don't like that. They don't like being called that, but that's a fundamental fact, and we can't shy away from it. Walker Wildmon: At the end of the day, what I found interesting about this conversation, in which Michael Knowles is basically being tag-teamed by Piers Morgan and this homosexual activist, is that he is unable to answer questions and persistently interrupted. Walker Wildmon: When Michael Knowles is talking about natural versus unnatural behavior, which homosexuality is in fact unnatural behavior, it's before your very eyes. When you look at human anatomy, human biology, science, and natural law, there is nothing natural about homosexual activity. Walker Wildmon: To the contrary, when you look at male-female relations and male-female anatomy, from every perspective, male and female were made for one another for the purposes of childbearing and reproduction. That's God's created order. Folks, this is Genesis 1 and 2 stuff. This is not rocket science. One of the natural byproducts of male and female relations, specifically marriage, is offspring, the bearing of children. This has been going on for thousands of years. Walker Wildmon: This homosexual activist pivots from that conversation about natural and unnatural human behavior and deviance to, "Well, don't animals do this stuff?" Let's talk about that. Don't animals do this stuff? Folks, animals do a lot of things that humans should not do, including kill their own children. Walker Wildmon: This secular, paganistic, or perhaps nihilistic and humanistic worldview rejects God. It not only rejects God and the Bible, but also the fundamental truth that man is created in the image of God and that we are distinctly different from animals. Walker Wildmon: When you reject God, reject the Bible, equate humans with animals, and say, "The animals do this, so we ought to be able to do that," that is clearly unbiblical, clearly unscientific, and a very faulty and dangerous argument and position to hold. Walker Wildmon: The world before our very eyes, everything in the revelation we have before us, both in God's Word and in nature, shows that man is unique and created in the image of God Himself. Walker Wildmon: We've had a fascinating discussion about the debate over human sexuality, homosexuality, and the LGBTQ agenda. I will say that, as Christians, we've somewhat made some gains in this arena over the last five to seven years. Walker Wildmon: Before Obergefell and the Supreme Court ruling in 2015, and in the decade or so before that, Christians and conservatives had really lost a lot of ground on this. We were very timid in debating this subject and timid in our way of talking about it. We didn't want to be called a bigot or a homophobe. We didn't want to be put on the SPLC hate list or hate watch map. We didn't want to be canceled. There was a lot of tiptoeing around and walking on eggshells. Walker Wildmon: I will say that we've made some movement and gained some momentum when we can actually openly debate these subjects. We ought to be able to do that without fear of cancellation or fear of being called names because, honestly, at the end of the day, folks, I don't care. I've already been targeted by the Southern Poverty Law Center. I've already been put on their hate watch list. The left doesn't like me, and at the end of the day, I couldn't care less. Walker Wildmon: I'm here to proclaim biblical convictions on all subject matters, including human sexuality. Diverting from God's created order is harmful to all humans, both people who profess Christ and people who don't, whether agnostics, Jews, Muslims, or whatever. It's a fact that when humans steer away from God's natural order and toward unnatural things, sin is harmful to humanity. It is harmful to the people involved in such sin. Walker Wildmon: The Christian worldview, despite what the unbelieving world says, is a very compassionate, loving, and caring worldview because it understands that man is sinful, that we're fallen, and that we need Jesus. We need a Savior. We need a propitiation for our sins. We need a replacement on the cross for us. Walker Wildmon: We want everyone to know that because if you trust in Jesus for salvation, the sinless Son of God, you can have eternal life. You can be rescued from your sin, not just in this life, but in the afterlife as well. Walker Wildmon: Those who truly understand the Bible and truly understand the heart of God through His revelation in Scripture and through the Holy Spirit understand that the Christian faith, worldview, and religion is, number one, the only true religion, but is also a very loving and compassionate worldview and belief system. Walker Wildmon: But it's the enemy, Satan himself, who wants to twist the truth against God, against God's Word, and against His people. That's what's happening as we try to have these debates and conversations about truth and lies and God's plan for human sexuality. The Christian is persistently demonized, persistently called names, and persistently canceled. We get to a point where we can't even have the conversation. Walker Wildmon: You see that in the clip I played, where Michael Knowles is simply trying to explain his viewpoint. He is persistently interrupted and put off track from his original point so that he can never make a point. That is a tactic of the left. That is a tactic of the God-haters. They don't want to have true debate and true conversation. They want to distract and divert. Walker Wildmon: Kudos to Michael Knowles once again for having the hard conversation and making the hard points about God's design for human sexuality. It's a good thing that we're having these debates in public, even among people who don't agree with us. Walker Wildmon: The next topic I want to talk about has to do with work ethic. I came across this clip on X of the well-known filmmaker and Hollywood star, for lack of a better word, Tyler Perry. Anyone who knows Tyler Perry, just from his background and his politics, knows he's no conservative and probably doesn't agree with us on a lot. Walker Wildmon: Nonetheless, Tyler Perry was doing this sit-down conversation and podcast with several men. Somehow, they got on the topic of work ethic, the Perry family wealth, and how different family members like to ask Tyler Perry for money because he's obviously very wealthy and well-to-do from his career. Walker Wildmon: He made some very good points that I wanted to play. They tie in well with the topic of biblical work ethic and the fact that we shouldn't just hand out money and benefits without something in exchange for it, such as work. Listen to this conversation about how Tyler Perry began treating family members who were simply asking for handouts. Tyler Perry: I fired my aunt. I fired my aunt. She said she wanted a job. She would always call asking for money, asking for money. I was sending money. I said, "Listen, I want to help you. I don't want to help you build this welfare mentality. Let me give you a job." Tyler Perry: She wasn't coming in and was calling in all the time. I said, "Okay, well, you've got to go because you want me to hand you the money, but you don't want to work for it. That doesn't work for me." Tyler Perry: It's the same way with my son. He's 10 years old. There are certain things he wants, and he has to do chores and work for them. I don't believe in giving us things that are just going to handicap us. That is the worst thing you can do. Tyler Perry: I've had family members whom I've done that to because my mother asked me to. When she passed away in 2009, I sent all of them letters saying, "Listen, you've got 60 days to become gainfully employed because I'm not going to keep supporting you." I'm serious. One hundred percent of them got jobs. They weren't even jobs where they were making a lot of money, but they were jobs. It was something for them to do and feel some pride in. That's the same thing I would want somebody to do for me. Walker Wildmon: That's Tyler Perry talking about how he said, "I fired my aunt. I had to fire my aunt." He said people in the family kept coming around, even after his mother passed away, asking for money. "Can I get this? I need thousands of dollars." He said, "Look, I passed out a letter after my mom passed away, and I gave them 60 days' notice. Everybody's got to get a job." Walker Wildmon: We can learn from this, folks. We can learn from this. As we've been talking throughout the show about compassion, love, kindness, and caring for others, which are all obviously biblical characteristics, we have to properly define these terms persistently. Why? Because the world twists them. Walker Wildmon: The world takes terms such as love, kindness, and equality, terms that historically have very specific meanings, and twists and uses them for political and ideological purposes. In many cases, those purposes are directly contrary to the true meaning and purpose of the terms. Walker Wildmon: Let's talk about charity. Let's talk about welfare. Let's even talk about Christian charity. There's the civil government side of things, which is honestly too involved in charity and welfare. A lot of these roles, duties, and responsibilities should be left to the local church. Walker Wildmon: Nonetheless, I have never been a fan, although I've probably been guilty of it a couple of times, of giving cash to so-called homeless people or people who are without a job and standing on the side of the street holding up a sign asking for money. That also applies to people who approach you in public asking for money. At least throughout my adult years, I've been staunchly opposed to simply giving people cash. Walker Wildmon: I could probably make a pretty strong biblical argument using the Scripture passage about how if you don't work, you don't eat. I could probably make a pretty strong case that Christians ought not to hand out cash to strangers. But there's no need for me to necessarily make that point now, even though I just did. Walker Wildmon: The reason I'm personally against it, and this is a conviction I have, is that as part of being a good steward of what God has entrusted me with, I don't feel confident or comfortable handing a complete stranger cash when I don't know what they're going to do with it. They might gamble with it. They might buy cigarettes with it. They might buy alcohol or illicit drugs. I don't know how the money is going to be spent. Walker Wildmon: I don't give money to strangers. I do not give cash to strangers. Let me say that. I do not give cash to strangers. Walker Wildmon: Here's what I do instead. This is at a very micro level, and then we'll talk more broadly about how our society should handle this. When I'm approached in public by people who have needs and are asking for money, my typical response is, "Look, I don't keep cash on me," which is an honest statement. I don't keep cash on me. Walker Wildmon: But if you're hungry, let's go next door and I'll grab you a bite to eat. If you need something to drink, let's go into the convenience store and I'll grab you a couple of drinks. Whatever the need is, if it's a very practical need, I'll say, "Look, I can meet your practical need. We can do it in five minutes, and I know where my money is going." Whether you eat the food or not is up to you. Walker Wildmon: Let me tell you what my experience is. My experience, and this is anecdotal, is that nine out of 10 times, when I offer a beggar, a homeless person, or someone on the streets a fresh meal instead of cash, they turn me down. Nine out of 10 times, they turn me down. Why? Because they're just looking for cash. They're just looking for a quick handout with no strings attached. They can use the money for anything, even things with which I fundamentally disagree. Walker Wildmon: When we extrapolate this to our broader culture and Tyler Perry's point about ending the handouts for family members who weren't working, we've got to restore this principle of work and income. Work and income. Walker Wildmon: Among all the other problems we're dealing with, our culture has gotten so hooked on free, free, free, free. "Give me this. Give me that. This entitlement, that entitlement." It is unbiblical, toxic, and counterproductive to our culture, society, and economy. Walker Wildmon: Some people get excited about handouts. They get excited about free stuff. They get excited about a new government program. Folks, I don't get excited about it at all. Here's why: Someone is paying for it. Walker Wildmon: The chief sin for which our country is responsible, and not just our government, because I don't like blanket criticisms of government, involves this massive welfare state that we have deployed. Let's be specific. Our country, including the voters, our leaders, and the adults in the room nearly a hundred years ago, is responsible for it. Walker Wildmon: Our government, through elected representatives and ultimately through the voters who sent them to Washington, D.C., launched what has now become this welfare state during the 1930s, 1940s, and some of the 1950s. We created a government program for anything and everything. If you're having a hard time, we'll just give you money. Walker Wildmon: That has been a net negative for the country. I'll tell you why it's been a negative for two reasons. The first and most important reason is that it has indebted our country to the tune of trillions of dollars. It has indebted the whole country. Walker Wildmon: Every adult, every citizen, and every voter now has a per capita debt for which we're responsible as a country. The federal government has put it on us. They've printed to the tune of $40 trillion, largely driven by the massive welfare state that we operate in America. Walker Wildmon: That's the first problem I have with it and the first direct harm that has been caused. We have $40 trillion in debt, largely because of this massive welfare state in which Washington, D.C., says, "We'll take care of everybody. We'll take care of the young, the elderly, and everybody in between. There's a program for everyone." Walker Wildmon: We've removed the urgency for employment and the urgency for a work ethic because, after all, Washington, D.C., will come in and save the day. That's the first thing. Walker Wildmon: The second thing this has done is more on the individual level. We've removed the principle of dignity related to work and income. We have turned income into something we can get no matter what. Working or not working, it doesn't matter. We can take care of your income. Walker Wildmon: From a moral and human perspective, that has been very damaging to the human spirit in America. There is something unique about how God wired man so that we get a biblical, natural pleasure from working and seeing the benefits and fruit of our work. When you strip that away from a human being, it has a very devastating effect. Walker Wildmon: Let's shift topics and talk about some news items and federal investigations that are going on in Washington, D.C. Walker Wildmon: Representative Ilhan Omar, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, is obviously a well-known Democrat. She has been one of the faces of the very far-left Democrat Party. She has been scrutinized, and there have been reports questioning her citizenship and her marriage in previous years. Who was she married to? Was she married to a relative? How did she become a U.S. citizen? Was it legitimate or fraudulent? How did she get here? Walker Wildmon: There have been many questions and credible media reports with a lot of supporting information questioning the entire background of who Ilhan Omar is. Up until now, it has largely been speculation, and it didn't seem like it would go anywhere. Walker Wildmon: Some of the investigation we're going to talk about actually began under the Obama administration, surprisingly, which I learned today. President Trump's administration and his Department of Justice then picked it up. We'll talk about what's going on with Ilhan Omar. Walker Wildmon: I'm going to start by giving you some background because this is a comprehensive and voluminous topic. We're talking about a couple of decades of Ilhan Omar's history in the United States. Let me give you a timeline, and then I'll tell you exactly what is being questioned through the investigation and subpoenas that have been issued. They have since searched her home and devices, and her passport has been seized. Walker Wildmon: In the 1990s, Ilhan Omar's family fled Somalia and ended up in the United States. Roughly around 1995 is when she migrated to the United States. They came as refugees, not U.S. citizens. Ilhan Omar ended up in Minneapolis, and of course she is a representative from the state of Minnesota. Walker Wildmon: In 2000, Ilhan Omar became a U.S. citizen through derivative naturalization through her father. She has said previously and claimed in paperwork that she was 17 years old at the time of the derivative naturalization. The official records on the books now, in 2026, list her birth year as 1982. That's an important fact that we'll come back to. Walker Wildmon: From 2009 to 2017, Ilhan Omar was married to British citizen Ahmed Nur Said Elmi. There are longstanding allegations claiming that the gentleman Ilhan Omar married in 2009 was a family member, possibly her brother. Those are the allegations, and there is substantial evidence presented to support them. Once again, I do want to note that it is still an allegation. Walker Wildmon: The potential reason for a fraudulent marriage, which is the allegation, would be to obtain marriage and immigration benefits. That would be the reason if it were proven true. Representative Omar has denied this and is now married to another gentleman, Ahmed Hirsi. Walker Wildmon: From 2016 to 2019, the allegations resurfaced publicly during her Minnesota House and congressional campaigns. A 2019 Trump administration review of her immigration file found no citizenship issues. Some public records of her birth year were corrected from 1981 to 1982 at her staff's request. That was around the 2017 to 2018 timeline. Walker Wildmon: In September of this year, 2026, the Office of Congressional Conduct recommended dismissing allegations related to financial disclosures. That was a separate topic. Walker Wildmon: Fast-forward to October 2026. The Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice received permission through a court order to search Ilhan Omar's home and phone and seize her passports, computer, documents, and other materials. Multiple search warrants were served on October 12, 2026. Walker Wildmon: Here is the latest on what could be a very explosive investigation with potential indictments. More than a dozen grand jury subpoenas were issued in Minnesota in October 2026 in connection with this investigation, including subpoenas to relatives such as her sister. The reported focus is possible false statements, conspiracy, and immigration fraud regarding her birth date and family paperwork. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin describes this as a "strong case." Walker Wildmon: Here's where the focus is today. Among other things, the primary focus, from my understanding, is whether she was 17 or 18 at the time of the naturalization process. There may be other alleged crimes or other things being investigated, but was Ilhan Omar even eligible for derivative naturalization when it occurred? Walker Wildmon: If she was in fact 17, she would have been eligible because she would have been a minor and her father completed the application and went through the process. If she was 18 at the time of the derivative naturalization process, she would have been ineligible. Why? Because she would have been an adult. Walker Wildmon: Her birth year was listed as 1981 for decades. It was not until 2017 or 2018, when it was being investigated, that her office requested a change to her birth year in official paperwork to 1982, which would have made her a minor when she became a naturalized U.S. citizen. Walker Wildmon: That is a big deal. How do you get your birth year wrong for decades in paperwork? Was she 17 or was she 18? That's very important. It raises serious questions about whether Ilhan Omar is even a legal U.S. citizen under the naturalization process. Walker Wildmon: This has massive consequences, and this is a well-known representative and face of the Democrat Party. Walker Wildmon: When it comes to the allegation that Ilhan Omar potentially married her brother, she addressed it in an interview with MS NOW recently. Listen to her answer. It's a very uncertain answer as to whether she married a family member. Interviewer: Who was this man who was your husband? When did they start saying that he was your brother? Why? Ilhan Omar: It started with a Somali blog. I don't know if it still exists, but somebody put in there that he had to have been my brother or something to that effect. Interviewer: You were not related to him at all? There's not a kernel of truth? Ilhan Omar: Not to my knowledge. Walker Wildmon: You would think you'd know if you were related to the person you married, but she said, "Not to my knowledge." What an answer. What an answer. Walker Wildmon: This is an interview with a very friendly outlet in MS NOW. She easily could have said, "Absolutely not. Of course I didn't marry a family member. That's just weird and disgusting. I would never marry a family member. No, absolutely not. I roundly reject that. It's not true." Walker Wildmon: Instead, during a criminal investigation, she gives the most legalistic answer of all: "Not to my knowledge." What? Not to my knowledge? That's like asking, "Did you send that email on this date four years ago?" and answering, "I just don't know. Not to my knowledge. I have no knowledge of that, Senator." That's what they always say: "Not to my knowledge." What? Walker Wildmon: Put yourself in her shoes, folks. If you were questioned about whether you married a family member, specifically your brother in this allegation, and you told the person, "Not to my knowledge," that in and of itself is an explosive statement that raises serious questions. Walker Wildmon: It's important to note that everything she is saying now could be used against her because she's under investigation. She's doing very few media appearances, but whatever her answers are could potentially be used during an investigation or even a trial. Walker Wildmon: She says, "Not to my knowledge," which potentially leaves her with the defense, "Well, I didn't know he was my brother." What? That's your defense? "I didn't know he was my brother"? What on this earth? Walker Wildmon: You've really got two shocking allegations here, with the evidence around them continuing to compound. Number one, that she potentially married her brother, which would be marriage fraud for the potential of obtaining marriage benefits and citizenship benefits. Secondly, there's the possibility that she wasn't even eligible for naturalization. Walker Wildmon: I want to give credit where credit is due. These are the types of investigations and potential indictments that other Republican administrations would never have touched because they would have been accused of being bigoted, targeting an immigrant, targeting a woman, or targeting a Muslim. They would have been told, "You just can't do this." Walker Wildmon: Previous Republicans would never have touched this. As for people claiming this is politically motivated, how so? Just because she's an elected Democratic representative, it's politically motivated? Walker Wildmon: The question we should ask ourselves is this: If justice is blind and the law is applied equally across the board, which we know isn't perfectly true because this is not a perfect world, but if that's our goal in this country, then why is Ilhan Omar off the table? Why can't we investigate her? Walker Wildmon: They investigate Trump and everybody else under the sun with no plausible evidence and under false pretenses. All of their witch hunts and investigations have been debunked. Walker Wildmon: Here, Ilhan Omar changed her year of birth in 2017. Not her date of birth or location of birth. She changed the entire year she was born. You don't know when you were born? Then, when questioned about whether she married a family member, she says, "Not to my knowledge." Walker Wildmon: The implications here are massive in the sense that this is who the Democrats are. This is who the Democrats are. The Squad, the AOCs of the world, and the Democrat Party have leaned into the Ilhan Omars of the party. Walker Wildmon: It could very well be proven that Ilhan Omar is an illegal immigrant who has been illegitimately serving and representing the people of Minnesota for years and could even be deported. Walker Wildmon: If the investigation proves these allegations, it will have massive ramifications for the Democrat Party and the type of people they choose to be spokespersons for their party. Thanks for joining At the Core. We'll see you next time.
Walker Wildmon: Welcome to At the Core here on American Family Radio. Walker Wildmon here with you. Glad to be with you on this edition of the program. The show is hosted each week by myself and my good friend Rick Green, America's Constitution Coach. He and I rotate throughout the week, and we're glad to have you here on the American Family Radio Network. Walker Wildmon: We've got a jam-packed show and a lot to talk about in the news. The one thing that I want to make sure we get to today is what America is facing when we talk about the Democrat Party. What are the type of people that we're dealing with as a country when it comes to the Democrat Party? Walker Wildmon: This is obviously midterm election season. The midterm election is on Tuesday, November 3. You need to vote, vote, vote and be educated by using iVoterGuide.com, America's most conservative, expansive, and comprehensive voter guide. Go there, key in your voting address, and have your personalized ballot pulled up. Walker Wildmon: As we head into the midterms, and of course every year there are certain elections around the country, and in 2028 we'll have a presidential election, we need to know what the parties represent and the type of people running the parties. That's what we're going to spend at least most of our time on today, and we'll talk about other things as well. Walker Wildmon: Jumping into the content for today, I came across this clip from Michael Knowles. He was on the Piers Morgan show with an LGBTQ activist and someone who actually is a self-professed homosexual. They were having this debate about homosexuality, whether it's natural or unnatural, and why people are against it. It was a very fascinating conversation and debate. Walker Wildmon: The original clip ran about five minutes. I summarized it down to this core issue of discussing how homosexuality is unnatural. This is a debate on Piers Morgan's show. Piers Morgan is rather liberal, but it was a pretty good conversation and debate, even though Michael Knowles kept getting interrupted persistently. Walker Wildmon: I want you to pay attention to two things. The first thing I want you to pay attention to is how the homosexual activist uses animal comparisons to talk about human behavior. That's the first red flag because, per God's created order, scientific evidence, natural law, and the Bible, humans are not animals. We are distinctly different from every other created being in that we have a conscience. We have a soul that animals do not. Walker Wildmon: The second is how quickly this homosexual activist shifts the conversation away from the core debate of natural versus unnatural behavior, then begins name-calling and drops unproven allegations against Michael Knowles. Listen to this fascinating conversation. Piers Morgan: Why is it not okay for men to marry men and women to marry women? Michael Knowles: Because it's like asking, why can't a circle be a square? It just isn't. Piers Morgan: Well, that doesn't make any sense. That's not an answer to my question. Why do you believe that that isn't okay? Michael Knowles: Because marriage, in its nature, is the union between a man and a woman for the purpose of procreation. Piers Morgan: According to marriage? According to what it is? According to the Bible? Michael Knowles: No, according to nature. Activist: Right. Insane. Michael Knowles: According to nature. Activist: What are you talking about, according to nature? We've seen in nature that there are gay animals, right? Michael Knowles: Yeah, that's not marriage. They're not married. Activist: No, because marriage is what? It's a social construct. Michael Knowles: It's a natural construct. Piers Morgan: Do you accept that, as you just quite rightly pointed out, animals don't get married? Michael Knowles: I'm about to say something you might agree with. Piers Morgan: Shut up a minute, right? Do you accept that his proclivity to having sex with other men is a natural thing? Activist: But it's also love. I want to make that distinction. Piers Morgan: And love. Michael Knowles: I think there are all sorts of weird deviations and aberrations that come out. Activist: That's not an okay word to use. Piers Morgan: But if it's natural, why is it deviant? Michael Knowles: Because we mean natural in two different ways. We mean natural as things that just happen. Animals will kill each other and eat each other. Cannibalism is natural, I guess, in that way. We also mean natural as man's participation in the moral law, in the eternal law. You say, look, maybe cannibalism is natural in a certain sense, but really it's totally contrary to the natural law. It's not good for human beings, so we shouldn't do it. I say marriage is a natural institution. Piers Morgan: But you think he's a deviant for being gay? Michael Knowles: Yeah, a little bit. Activist: But that's a little opinion of it. The thing is, people who are homophobic, which you are being a little bit right now, are always closeted gay men afraid of their own feelings. Michael Knowles: Hold on. Activist: The research says it. Michael Knowles: Wait a second. What I think is happening here is... Activist: You are afraid of your own closeted homosexual feelings. That's why you're saying it's not natural. Michael Knowles: You know what's amazing about that rejoinder, which I always hear, is that if you express the view of homosexuality held by Christians, religious Jews, Muslims, and perfectly ordinary people, notice what the really pro-LGBT activists will always say. The very first thing they'll do to insult you is say, "Well, actually, you're secretly gay." Activist: I wasn't even using it as an insult. You're the one using it as an insult. Walker Wildmon: Folks, this is why the left can't debate us. By the way, kudos to Michael Knowles for not bending the knee here. When Piers Morgan said, "Do you think he's a deviant?" Michael Knowles said, "Yeah, somewhat of a deviant." Good for him. Walker Wildmon: Often, the pressure regarding viewpoints and convictions on human sexuality is intense. People succumb to it every day. "Oh, let's just be nice." Well, I don't know where in the Bible it says to be nice. If you're talking about being kind to others and loving others, being kind and loving is telling people the truth. You can tell people the truth with compassion and understanding, and you don't have to be overly provocative or offensive. Walker Wildmon: But folks, the Bible in and of itself is offensive to some. The Bible is offensive to people who are hostile to Christianity and biblical truth. They don't like it. They hate it. We can't water the Bible down. We can't nice our way out of these debates. Winning everybody over is fairy-tale land. That is actually unbiblical. Walker Wildmon: Kudos to Michael Knowles for not trying to nice his way out of this debate. He says, no, this is deviant behavior. As a result, if you are engaging in sex between two men, which is sodomy, then that is deviant behavior and you are a deviant. That's a hard truth, and people don't like that. They don't like being called that, but that's a fundamental fact, and we can't shy away from it. Walker Wildmon: At the end of the day, what I found interesting about this conversation, in which Michael Knowles is basically being tag-teamed by Piers Morgan and this homosexual activist, is that he is unable to answer questions and persistently interrupted. Walker Wildmon: When Michael Knowles is talking about natural versus unnatural behavior, which homosexuality is in fact unnatural behavior, it's before your very eyes. When you look at human anatomy, human biology, science, and natural law, there is nothing natural about homosexual activity. Walker Wildmon: To the contrary, when you look at male-female relations and male-female anatomy, from every perspective, male and female were made for one another for the purposes of childbearing and reproduction. That's God's created order. Folks, this is Genesis 1 and 2 stuff. This is not rocket science. One of the natural byproducts of male and female relations, specifically marriage, is offspring, the bearing of children. This has been going on for thousands of years. Walker Wildmon: This homosexual activist pivots from that conversation about natural and unnatural human behavior and deviance to, "Well, don't animals do this stuff?" Let's talk about that. Don't animals do this stuff? Folks, animals do a lot of things that humans should not do, including kill their own children. Walker Wildmon: This secular, paganistic, or perhaps nihilistic and humanistic worldview rejects God. It not only rejects God and the Bible, but also the fundamental truth that man is created in the image of God and that we are distinctly different from animals. Walker Wildmon: When you reject God, reject the Bible, equate humans with animals, and say, "The animals do this, so we ought to be able to do that," that is clearly unbiblical, clearly unscientific, and a very faulty and dangerous argument and position to hold. Walker Wildmon: The world before our very eyes, everything in the revelation we have before us, both in God's Word and in nature, shows that man is unique and created in the image of God Himself. Walker Wildmon: We've had a fascinating discussion about the debate over human sexuality, homosexuality, and the LGBTQ agenda. I will say that, as Christians, we've somewhat made some gains in this arena over the last five to seven years. Walker Wildmon: Before Obergefell and the Supreme Court ruling in 2015, and in the decade or so before that, Christians and conservatives had really lost a lot of ground on this. We were very timid in debating this subject and timid in our way of talking about it. We didn't want to be called a bigot or a homophobe. We didn't want to be put on the SPLC hate list or hate watch map. We didn't want to be canceled. There was a lot of tiptoeing around and walking on eggshells. Walker Wildmon: I will say that we've made some movement and gained some momentum when we can actually openly debate these subjects. We ought to be able to do that without fear of cancellation or fear of being called names because, honestly, at the end of the day, folks, I don't care. I've already been targeted by the Southern Poverty Law Center. I've already been put on their hate watch list. The left doesn't like me, and at the end of the day, I couldn't care less. Walker Wildmon: I'm here to proclaim biblical convictions on all subject matters, including human sexuality. Diverting from God's created order is harmful to all humans, both people who profess Christ and people who don't, whether agnostics, Jews, Muslims, or whatever. It's a fact that when humans steer away from God's natural order and toward unnatural things, sin is harmful to humanity. It is harmful to the people involved in such sin. Walker Wildmon: The Christian worldview, despite what the unbelieving world says, is a very compassionate, loving, and caring worldview because it understands that man is sinful, that we're fallen, and that we need Jesus. We need a Savior. We need a propitiation for our sins. We need a replacement on the cross for us. Walker Wildmon: We want everyone to know that because if you trust in Jesus for salvation, the sinless Son of God, you can have eternal life. You can be rescued from your sin, not just in this life, but in the afterlife as well. Walker Wildmon: Those who truly understand the Bible and truly understand the heart of God through His revelation in Scripture and through the Holy Spirit understand that the Christian faith, worldview, and religion is, number one, the only true religion, but is also a very loving and compassionate worldview and belief system. Walker Wildmon: But it's the enemy, Satan himself, who wants to twist the truth against God, against God's Word, and against His people. That's what's happening as we try to have these debates and conversations about truth and lies and God's plan for human sexuality. The Christian is persistently demonized, persistently called names, and persistently canceled. We get to a point where we can't even have the conversation. Walker Wildmon: You see that in the clip I played, where Michael Knowles is simply trying to explain his viewpoint. He is persistently interrupted and put off track from his original point so that he can never make a point. That is a tactic of the left. That is a tactic of the God-haters. They don't want to have true debate and true conversation. They want to distract and divert. Walker Wildmon: Kudos to Michael Knowles once again for having the hard conversation and making the hard points about God's design for human sexuality. It's a good thing that we're having these debates in public, even among people who don't agree with us. Walker Wildmon: The next topic I want to talk about has to do with work ethic. I came across this clip on X of the well-known filmmaker and Hollywood star, for lack of a better word, Tyler Perry. Anyone who knows Tyler Perry, just from his background and his politics, knows he's no conservative and probably doesn't agree with us on a lot. Walker Wildmon: Nonetheless, Tyler Perry was doing this sit-down conversation and podcast with several men. Somehow, they got on the topic of work ethic, the Perry family wealth, and how different family members like to ask Tyler Perry for money because he's obviously very wealthy and well-to-do from his career. Walker Wildmon: He made some very good points that I wanted to play. They tie in well with the topic of biblical work ethic and the fact that we shouldn't just hand out money and benefits without something in exchange for it, such as work. Listen to this conversation about how Tyler Perry began treating family members who were simply asking for handouts. Tyler Perry: I fired my aunt. I fired my aunt. She said she wanted a job. She would always call asking for money, asking for money. I was sending money. I said, "Listen, I want to help you. I don't want to help you build this welfare mentality. Let me give you a job." Tyler Perry: She wasn't coming in and was calling in all the time. I said, "Okay, well, you've got to go because you want me to hand you the money, but you don't want to work for it. That doesn't work for me." Tyler Perry: It's the same way with my son. He's 10 years old. There are certain things he wants, and he has to do chores and work for them. I don't believe in giving us things that are just going to handicap us. That is the worst thing you can do. Tyler Perry: I've had family members whom I've done that to because my mother asked me to. When she passed away in 2009, I sent all of them letters saying, "Listen, you've got 60 days to become gainfully employed because I'm not going to keep supporting you." I'm serious. One hundred percent of them got jobs. They weren't even jobs where they were making a lot of money, but they were jobs. It was something for them to do and feel some pride in. That's the same thing I would want somebody to do for me. Walker Wildmon: That's Tyler Perry talking about how he said, "I fired my aunt. I had to fire my aunt." He said people in the family kept coming around, even after his mother passed away, asking for money. "Can I get this? I need thousands of dollars." He said, "Look, I passed out a letter after my mom passed away, and I gave them 60 days' notice. Everybody's got to get a job." Walker Wildmon: We can learn from this, folks. We can learn from this. As we've been talking throughout the show about compassion, love, kindness, and caring for others, which are all obviously biblical characteristics, we have to properly define these terms persistently. Why? Because the world twists them. Walker Wildmon: The world takes terms such as love, kindness, and equality, terms that historically have very specific meanings, and twists and uses them for political and ideological purposes. In many cases, those purposes are directly contrary to the true meaning and purpose of the terms. Walker Wildmon: Let's talk about charity. Let's talk about welfare. Let's even talk about Christian charity. There's the civil government side of things, which is honestly too involved in charity and welfare. A lot of these roles, duties, and responsibilities should be left to the local church. Walker Wildmon: Nonetheless, I have never been a fan, although I've probably been guilty of it a couple of times, of giving cash to so-called homeless people or people who are without a job and standing on the side of the street holding up a sign asking for money. That also applies to people who approach you in public asking for money. At least throughout my adult years, I've been staunchly opposed to simply giving people cash. Walker Wildmon: I could probably make a pretty strong biblical argument using the Scripture passage about how if you don't work, you don't eat. I could probably make a pretty strong case that Christians ought not to hand out cash to strangers. But there's no need for me to necessarily make that point now, even though I just did. Walker Wildmon: The reason I'm personally against it, and this is a conviction I have, is that as part of being a good steward of what God has entrusted me with, I don't feel confident or comfortable handing a complete stranger cash when I don't know what they're going to do with it. They might gamble with it. They might buy cigarettes with it. They might buy alcohol or illicit drugs. I don't know how the money is going to be spent. Walker Wildmon: I don't give money to strangers. I do not give cash to strangers. Let me say that. I do not give cash to strangers. Walker Wildmon: Here's what I do instead. This is at a very micro level, and then we'll talk more broadly about how our society should handle this. When I'm approached in public by people who have needs and are asking for money, my typical response is, "Look, I don't keep cash on me," which is an honest statement. I don't keep cash on me. Walker Wildmon: But if you're hungry, let's go next door and I'll grab you a bite to eat. If you need something to drink, let's go into the convenience store and I'll grab you a couple of drinks. Whatever the need is, if it's a very practical need, I'll say, "Look, I can meet your practical need. We can do it in five minutes, and I know where my money is going." Whether you eat the food or not is up to you. Walker Wildmon: Let me tell you what my experience is. My experience, and this is anecdotal, is that nine out of 10 times, when I offer a beggar, a homeless person, or someone on the streets a fresh meal instead of cash, they turn me down. Nine out of 10 times, they turn me down. Why? Because they're just looking for cash. They're just looking for a quick handout with no strings attached. They can use the money for anything, even things with which I fundamentally disagree. Walker Wildmon: When we extrapolate this to our broader culture and Tyler Perry's point about ending the handouts for family members who weren't working, we've got to restore this principle of work and income. Work and income. Walker Wildmon: Among all the other problems we're dealing with, our culture has gotten so hooked on free, free, free, free. "Give me this. Give me that. This entitlement, that entitlement." It is unbiblical, toxic, and counterproductive to our culture, society, and economy. Walker Wildmon: Some people get excited about handouts. They get excited about free stuff. They get excited about a new government program. Folks, I don't get excited about it at all. Here's why: Someone is paying for it. Walker Wildmon: The chief sin for which our country is responsible, and not just our government, because I don't like blanket criticisms of government, involves this massive welfare state that we have deployed. Let's be specific. Our country, including the voters, our leaders, and the adults in the room nearly a hundred years ago, is responsible for it. Walker Wildmon: Our government, through elected representatives and ultimately through the voters who sent them to Washington, D.C., launched what has now become this welfare state during the 1930s, 1940s, and some of the 1950s. We created a government program for anything and everything. If you're having a hard time, we'll just give you money. Walker Wildmon: That has been a net negative for the country. I'll tell you why it's been a negative for two reasons. The first and most important reason is that it has indebted our country to the tune of trillions of dollars. It has indebted the whole country. Walker Wildmon: Every adult, every citizen, and every voter now has a per capita debt for which we're responsible as a country. The federal government has put it on us. They've printed to the tune of $40 trillion, largely driven by the massive welfare state that we operate in America. Walker Wildmon: That's the first problem I have with it and the first direct harm that has been caused. We have $40 trillion in debt, largely because of this massive welfare state in which Washington, D.C., says, "We'll take care of everybody. We'll take care of the young, the elderly, and everybody in between. There's a program for everyone." Walker Wildmon: We've removed the urgency for employment and the urgency for a work ethic because, after all, Washington, D.C., will come in and save the day. That's the first thing. Walker Wildmon: The second thing this has done is more on the individual level. We've removed the principle of dignity related to work and income. We have turned income into something we can get no matter what. Working or not working, it doesn't matter. We can take care of your income. Walker Wildmon: From a moral and human perspective, that has been very damaging to the human spirit in America. There is something unique about how God wired man so that we get a biblical, natural pleasure from working and seeing the benefits and fruit of our work. When you strip that away from a human being, it has a very devastating effect. Walker Wildmon: Let's shift topics and talk about some news items and federal investigations that are going on in Washington, D.C. Walker Wildmon: Representative Ilhan Omar, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, is obviously a well-known Democrat. She has been one of the faces of the very far-left Democrat Party. She has been scrutinized, and there have been reports questioning her citizenship and her marriage in previous years. Who was she married to? Was she married to a relative? How did she become a U.S. citizen? Was it legitimate or fraudulent? How did she get here? Walker Wildmon: There have been many questions and credible media reports with a lot of supporting information questioning the entire background of who Ilhan Omar is. Up until now, it has largely been speculation, and it didn't seem like it would go anywhere. Walker Wildmon: Some of the investigation we're going to talk about actually began under the Obama administration, surprisingly, which I learned today. President Trump's administration and his Department of Justice then picked it up. We'll talk about what's going on with Ilhan Omar. Walker Wildmon: I'm going to start by giving you some background because this is a comprehensive and voluminous topic. We're talking about a couple of decades of Ilhan Omar's history in the United States. Let me give you a timeline, and then I'll tell you exactly what is being questioned through the investigation and subpoenas that have been issued. They have since searched her home and devices, and her passport has been seized. Walker Wildmon: In the 1990s, Ilhan Omar's family fled Somalia and ended up in the United States. Roughly around 1995 is when she migrated to the United States. They came as refugees, not U.S. citizens. Ilhan Omar ended up in Minneapolis, and of course she is a representative from the state of Minnesota. Walker Wildmon: In 2000, Ilhan Omar became a U.S. citizen through derivative naturalization through her father. She has said previously and claimed in paperwork that she was 17 years old at the time of the derivative naturalization. The official records on the books now, in 2026, list her birth year as 1982. That's an important fact that we'll come back to. Walker Wildmon: From 2009 to 2017, Ilhan Omar was married to British citizen Ahmed Nur Said Elmi. There are longstanding allegations claiming that the gentleman Ilhan Omar married in 2009 was a family member, possibly her brother. Those are the allegations, and there is substantial evidence presented to support them. Once again, I do want to note that it is still an allegation. Walker Wildmon: The potential reason for a fraudulent marriage, which is the allegation, would be to obtain marriage and immigration benefits. That would be the reason if it were proven true. Representative Omar has denied this and is now married to another gentleman, Ahmed Hirsi. Walker Wildmon: From 2016 to 2019, the allegations resurfaced publicly during her Minnesota House and congressional campaigns. A 2019 Trump administration review of her immigration file found no citizenship issues. Some public records of her birth year were corrected from 1981 to 1982 at her staff's request. That was around the 2017 to 2018 timeline. Walker Wildmon: In September of this year, 2026, the Office of Congressional Conduct recommended dismissing allegations related to financial disclosures. That was a separate topic. Walker Wildmon: Fast-forward to October 2026. The Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice received permission through a court order to search Ilhan Omar's home and phone and seize her passports, computer, documents, and other materials. Multiple search warrants were served on October 12, 2026. Walker Wildmon: Here is the latest on what could be a very explosive investigation with potential indictments. More than a dozen grand jury subpoenas were issued in Minnesota in October 2026 in connection with this investigation, including subpoenas to relatives such as her sister. The reported focus is possible false statements, conspiracy, and immigration fraud regarding her birth date and family paperwork. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin describes this as a "strong case." Walker Wildmon: Here's where the focus is today. Among other things, the primary focus, from my understanding, is whether she was 17 or 18 at the time of the naturalization process. There may be other alleged crimes or other things being investigated, but was Ilhan Omar even eligible for derivative naturalization when it occurred? Walker Wildmon: If she was in fact 17, she would have been eligible because she would have been a minor and her father completed the application and went through the process. If she was 18 at the time of the derivative naturalization process, she would have been ineligible. Why? Because she would have been an adult. Walker Wildmon: Her birth year was listed as 1981 for decades. It was not until 2017 or 2018, when it was being investigated, that her office requested a change to her birth year in official paperwork to 1982, which would have made her a minor when she became a naturalized U.S. citizen. Walker Wildmon: That is a big deal. How do you get your birth year wrong for decades in paperwork? Was she 17 or was she 18? That's very important. It raises serious questions about whether Ilhan Omar is even a legal U.S. citizen under the naturalization process. Walker Wildmon: This has massive consequences, and this is a well-known representative and face of the Democrat Party. Walker Wildmon: When it comes to the allegation that Ilhan Omar potentially married her brother, she addressed it in an interview with MS NOW recently. Listen to her answer. It's a very uncertain answer as to whether she married a family member. Interviewer: Who was this man who was your husband? When did they start saying that he was your brother? Why? Ilhan Omar: It started with a Somali blog. I don't know if it still exists, but somebody put in there that he had to have been my brother or something to that effect. Interviewer: You were not related to him at all? There's not a kernel of truth? Ilhan Omar: Not to my knowledge. Walker Wildmon: You would think you'd know if you were related to the person you married, but she said, "Not to my knowledge." What an answer. What an answer. Walker Wildmon: This is an interview with a very friendly outlet in MS NOW. She easily could have said, "Absolutely not. Of course I didn't marry a family member. That's just weird and disgusting. I would never marry a family member. No, absolutely not. I roundly reject that. It's not true." Walker Wildmon: Instead, during a criminal investigation, she gives the most legalistic answer of all: "Not to my knowledge." What? Not to my knowledge? That's like asking, "Did you send that email on this date four years ago?" and answering, "I just don't know. Not to my knowledge. I have no knowledge of that, Senator." That's what they always say: "Not to my knowledge." What? Walker Wildmon: Put yourself in her shoes, folks. If you were questioned about whether you married a family member, specifically your brother in this allegation, and you told the person, "Not to my knowledge," that in and of itself is an explosive statement that raises serious questions. Walker Wildmon: It's important to note that everything she is saying now could be used against her because she's under investigation. She's doing very few media appearances, but whatever her answers are could potentially be used during an investigation or even a trial. Walker Wildmon: She says, "Not to my knowledge," which potentially leaves her with the defense, "Well, I didn't know he was my brother." What? That's your defense? "I didn't know he was my brother"? What on this earth? Walker Wildmon: You've really got two shocking allegations here, with the evidence around them continuing to compound. Number one, that she potentially married her brother, which would be marriage fraud for the potential of obtaining marriage benefits and citizenship benefits. Secondly, there's the possibility that she wasn't even eligible for naturalization. Walker Wildmon: I want to give credit where credit is due. These are the types of investigations and potential indictments that other Republican administrations would never have touched because they would have been accused of being bigoted, targeting an immigrant, targeting a woman, or targeting a Muslim. They would have been told, "You just can't do this." Walker Wildmon: Previous Republicans would never have touched this. As for people claiming this is politically motivated, how so? Just because she's an elected Democratic representative, it's politically motivated? Walker Wildmon: The question we should ask ourselves is this: If justice is blind and the law is applied equally across the board, which we know isn't perfectly true because this is not a perfect world, but if that's our goal in this country, then why is Ilhan Omar off the table? Why can't we investigate her? Walker Wildmon: They investigate Trump and everybody else under the sun with no plausible evidence and under false pretenses. All of their witch hunts and investigations have been debunked. Walker Wildmon: Here, Ilhan Omar changed her year of birth in 2017. Not her date of birth or location of birth. She changed the entire year she was born. You don't know when you were born? Then, when questioned about whether she married a family member, she says, "Not to my knowledge." Walker Wildmon: The implications here are massive in the sense that this is who the Democrats are. This is who the Democrats are. The Squad, the AOCs of the world, and the Democrat Party have leaned into the Ilhan Omars of the party. Walker Wildmon: It could very well be proven that Ilhan Omar is an illegal immigrant who has been illegitimately serving and representing the people of Minnesota for years and could even be deported. Walker Wildmon: If the investigation proves these allegations, it will have massive ramifications for the Democrat Party and the type of people they choose to be spokespersons for their party. Thanks for joining At the Core. We'll see you next time.
Ilhan Omar is responding to renewed questions about her marriage and allegations that she married a family member. Walker Wildmon examines Omar’s public response and her answer when directly questioned about the controversy.
Walker also looks to Michael Knowles discussing homosexuality and cultural standards, while Tyler Perry shares his perspective on the importance of work ethic and personal responsibility.
Live
Did you know American Family Radio is listener-supported? Your monthly financial support will allow us to continue upholding Godly values through our numerous channels, like American Family Radio, One Million Moms, The Stand magazine, and many more.
Become a Great Commission Partner TODAY to help AFR transform culture by rebuilding the family. When you donate today, you’ll get access to:
