Hamilton: God has called us to be ambassadors even in this dark moment
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Darkness is not an affirmative force. It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: This is the, Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite, delivering people
>> Abraham Hamilton III: out of the bondage of mainstream media and the philosophies of this world.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: God has called you and me to be his ambassadors even in this dark moment. Let's not miss our moment.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: And now, the, Hamilton Corner.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Good evening everyone.
Many of you are making your transition from part time jobs to full time jobs
Welcome to the Hamilton Corner. My name is Abraham Hamilton iii. I am the host of this program, joined by the Corner contingent right across from me. My man, 100 grand. Mr. Bobby Rosa is manning the board. And in the screening room we have produce extraordinaire, often imitated but never duplicated, the real J. Mac. And we are ready to rock and roll with today's edition of the program. At this very moment, many of you, if not most of you, are making your transition from your part time where you generate an income, to your full time jobs where you cultivate an outcome. And as you do so, I want to remind you to do so with intentionality, understanding the primacy that God places on family and welcoming his view as communicated to us through his word to govern, guard and to guide your engagements. As the Apostle Peter said, all things that pertain to life and godliness, he's provided for us in his holy word, that illuminates to our minds via his spirit, where the spirit of God will remind us of all things that Jesus taught. And it is imperative that we embrace it. I am, going to explain as we go throughout the show today and provide an example, a pretty pertinent example of what happens when you have, the hiss and the suggestions of the talking snake laundered through academia. You know, there is a concerted effort to deceive palpable deception. That's why we did the show a few days ago about the Gibeonites, who were actually Hivites, who acted as if they came from a faraway place solely to deceive the Israelites to making a covenant with them. And that deception is plenteous in our society. But as you are making your transition, you have the opportunity to execute the King's commission starting right in your home. It's vitally important that we are ambassadors of the king of glory in the highways and byways of life and society. But we cannot seek to do so. And let me say it this way, we can, we should not seek to do so at the expense of our homes and our families. We have to, get back to the reality, that the gospel of the kingdom of God advances a person at a time, a neighbor at a time, a family at a time. a brother who has been a hero in the faith to me, who has become a friend, recently is Dr. Del Tackett, formerly of Focus, on the Family, who has been on the show before. I was on his show earlier this week. and he explains how for the first three centuries of, the NewSong Testament church that would grew from 12 men to the entirety of the Roman Empire expanded In those first 300 years from neighbor to neighbor. That's how it grew. It wasn't this, it didn't have a marketing budget. They didn't have a slick PR campaign with a spokesman tuning in now. You know, didn't have, didn't have a tour with lights, camera, action. They had people who loved Jesus enough to take him at his word and love their neighbors enough to recognize that the greatest thing I could ever do for my neighbor is communicate to them the necessity, of having eternal life. There's only one name under heaven by which men must be saved, and that is the name of Jesus Christ. That is what we get the privilege to do. Starting right in our homes and working outwardly from there. To the word of God we go. Second Corinthians, chapter 10. Second Corinthians, chapter 10, verses 3 through 5. Very familiar passage of scripture. This is not going to be novel to many of you, but this is so necessary. It's just fun how these people keep, recirculating. We got TVs on in the studio. You got Austan Golsbee on one of the screens. And he worked in the Obama administration. So now he's the chairman of the Federal bank, the Federal Reserve bank of Chicago. Well, geez, I wonder how that happens. Isn't it amazing how these people keep popping up in different places? You know, it's amazing, to the word of God. Second Corinthians, chapter 10, verses 3 through 5. This is what God's holy word says. For though we, though we walk in the flesh, we do not war according to the flesh. For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but divinely powerful for the destruction of forces. So some translations transliterate, that verbiage as to the destruction, to the demolition and demolishing of strongholds. All right, verse five. For we are destroying speculations, or other transliterations, say their imagination. So we are destroying speculations and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God. We are taking every thought captive to the obedience of Christ. This is so vitally important because, much of what is promulgated against the Lord's people in this time is to get us to conflate what is real and what is not real. For when the scripture says, for we walk in the flesh, we do not war according to the flesh. For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but are divinely powerful. Dr. Rathbun would say that the weapons of our warfare are not of this world, but they are of the real world. The real world is the spiritual world. That is the real world. That is the world where we who have placed our faith in Jesus Christ for your salvation will spend eternity and enjoy eternal life. Those who reject the free gift of salvation will spend their eternities in the real world, but suffering eternal damnation. It is vitally important that we understand what the real world truly, truly is.
The weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, they are divinely powerful
All right. The weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, meaning they are not natural in origin. Their potency isn't governed by the natural order. human familiarity doesn't dictate, the potency, the effectiveness of the utilization of our weaponry, in contrast to that natural orientation disposition the Lord has revealed to us in his holy word. But that the weapons of our warfare, which are not fleshly, they are divinely powerful. They are mighty through God. That reference to divinely powerful is a communication of their origin. Their origin is in God. Their capacity is dictated by God. Their utilization is ordained by God. Their effectiveness is stewarded and shepherded by God. But it's, incumbent upon us to understand that, to believe that, to live as if we believe that, and to implement our divinely powerful weaponry as if we do believe that. This reference to the capacity of our warfare, in their ability to destroy fortresses, to demolish strongholds. The Lord wouldn't have said that they were strongholds or fortresses if they were not fortress like, if they were not strongholds. The capacity for these strongholds to grip us have that capacity from our vantage point. But the weaponry that the Lord has afforded us has the capacity to obliterate them. And application of this weaponry is what enables us to do what verse five says. To destroy speculations, not entertain them. Not well. Everybody has a reasonable opinion. Not well. Surely I can see the value in that. No, no, no. When we recognize that these offerings are rooted in. In an antichrist disposition, there's no tiddlywinks to be played. Now we destroy those speculations. And I've Explained before, the Greek word for speculations there, or imaginations in the King James is logismos, which is related to the root word from which we get the word logic from much of, the warfare. And this is not to minimize or to say that this is the exclusive understanding, but much of the warfare that we engage in is to confront and to destroy antichrist ideologies that are offered in our society, to bind people, that become strongholds in people's lives. Have you noticed, this is just an example. Have you noticed how reflexively people who support the intentional slaughter of unborn children in the womb, have you noticed how vehemently many of them are gripped by that position? Do you think they've arrived at that fervent position merely by intellectual reasoning? No, no, no. To persuade men to be willing to encourage and even provide money to have their own offspring murdered for moms, women who are moms. This is when I. When I have the privilege of meeting and talking to pregnant women. I don't say, you will be a mom. I tell them, there are moms. When you have the little baby growing inside of you, you are a mom. But to have the ideologies that would convince moms to go and destroy their own children, you think that's merely the product of rationality? It's not. There's a demonic ideology at the root that undergirds all of this, not least to mention, and I won't get into the science on this, but when you have a mom and the baby is growing and her capacity to nurse her child is growing, and then to eliminate that, how that impacts, healthy breast tissue and how you can trace the ascendancy of things like breast cancer to the ascendancy of abortion in our society. But do you think that's the product of rationality alone? It's not. But the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but they're divinely power. They're divinely powerful. I'm sorry for the destruction of fortresses. And because of that, we, the people of God, have the opportunity, the wherewithal, the privileges, prerogative, and the responsibility to destroy logismas ideologies that would dare rival the truth of our Lord. And we do this not because we're, you know, societal, crusaders. We don't do this because we want to assert our own unilateral notions of rightness. No. We do this because we love our God with all our heart, soul, minds and strength. We love God, the true and living God, with all our heart, soul, minds and strength. And the Second is like it. We love our neighbor as ourselves. The truth of the matter is that the harvest is plentiful. Plentiful, but the laborers are few. Many in our world have eyes that are blinded, that are blinded. And God has dispatched his people as his hands and feet to be vessels through whom he opens blind eyes. That's why we destroy the vain ideologies. That's why we pray without ceasing. That's why we're willing to engage, even when it's not convenient for us. That's why our trips to the grocery store are not just trips to the grocery store. That's why when God has blessed us to live where we live, that we recognize man. It is by God's divine providence and assignment that I am placed where I am placed. And my neighbor is across the street from me. And my neighbor is beside me and another on the other side of me. That my life is a life that I live on mission. Because I recognize life on this side of eternity is fleeting and the evidence of the real world is imminent. We live in light of the real world. We live in light of eternity. And it is the love of God that compels us to compel men to be reconciled to God. Within all of the uncertainty that surrounds us. It's all the more reason, with fervor and zeal, with an urgency about ourselves, that we communicate that there's one name under heaven by which men must be saved. And when these antichrist ideology, whatever ism schism you want to mention that may not have rhythm, that, we examine it under the white hot scrutiny of God's holy word and cause those Antichrist ideologies to fold before the king of glory.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: A discipleship minute with Joseph Parker.
>> Joseph Parker: We were made to do the will of God. That's our design. That's what will really fulfill us, carrying out what he's called us to do. Whereas as much as we think we know what we want to do, we really don't. I think of the message of that great theologian Dr. Seuss, of course. The story of green eggs and ham. An interesting story. Sam, I am chases and chases the fella trying to convince him to eat green eggs and ham. And when he finally gives in, he finally decided, I'll eat them to get rid of Sam. I am. And when he tastes them, he realized, man, I like these. That's a beautiful example of the way the gospel is for people. When people finally surrender to Jesus, they come to realize Jesus is what I've
>> Abraham Hamilton III: been looking for my whole life.
>> Joseph Parker: And it's like something inside of them screams out, this is it. How important it is that we're about God's business, helping people to find out what life is all about. It's knowing Jesus and following him as well.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: I'm Rick Scarborough, and this is my take.
The 2026 World Cup brought hundreds of thousands of visitors from 48 nations
The 2026 World cup brought hundreds of thousands of visitors from 48 nations to 11American cities. Each arrived carrying an image of America shaped by headlines, politics and stereotypes. And most left surprised, saying America's nothing like the media told us. Fans marveled at the everyday things we take for granted. The freedom of travel, overflowing superstores, oversized meal portions, and above all, the warmth and hospitality of the people they met here. The missing story isn't the scoreboard. It's how quickly firsthand experience overturned expectation, replacing caricature with genuine admiration for a great nation. When a stranger's open heart meets a stranger's open hand, the lies of the headlines fall away. The world sees the goodness we've let politics obscure. I'm Rick Scarborough, and that's my take,
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Shining light into the darkness. This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
Abraham Hamilton III plays clip of Ross Douthat interviewing Samuel Moyn
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III here. I'm going to play something for you
>> Joseph Parker: now,
>> Abraham Hamilton III: and I want you to pay close attention to it, and I want you to see if you're able to detect the hiss of the talking snake as you listen. What I'm going to share with you is a clip from an interview, by Ross Douthot, who was at this time, and recently he made a change. And I explained that, a NewSong York Times columnist and an author, who is moving over to CBS to work on their 60 Minutes program. Ross, too, thought is, is understood to be conservative. and he is interviewing the Kent professor of law and history named Samuel Moyn. Samuel Moyn. All right. Samuel Moyn has, you know, the Ivy League pedigree. His undergraduate, I'm sorry, his Juris Doctorate degree came from Harvard Law School. He has a PhD in history from the University of California. And as I mentioned, he is the Kent professor of Law and History. That is a particular, distinguished title that he bears as he works at Yale University's law school. He's one of the people, if you would send your child to Yale Law School, he would be one of the people who would be teaching your child at the time that they might have made it to make it to law school. They probably would be adults by then. But I want you to hear because, Ross Douthat is responding to the Idea that Samuel Moyn, who is presenting. And just so you can distinguish the voices, Samuel Moyn is a person who said, well, you know, I girded myself with a little bit of hot water by espousing these ideas us. And I want you to listen, listen closely because these are the types of ideas, guys, that are being filtered through our society. Like, if you've ever wondered how could these people, they're so educated, how could they come to these conclusions? And as you listen, I also want you to consider, what does God's word have to say about any of this? All right, listen closely. This clip is going to be about a minute and 17 seconds long. This is Samuel Moyn espousing some, well, let me just let you listen to it and then I'll provide commentary thereafter. Listen to and watch clip number five. Clip five, go.
Professor Samuel Moyn says we should weight the votes of younger voters
>> Abraham Hamilton III: I've gotten in some hot water for proposing we consider overweighting the. The votes of younger people are assigning the youngest eligible voters proxy votes for the unrepresented children of our country. so those are edgy.
>> Speaker G: Ah, why not assign them to those children's parents?
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Well, because there's a divergence of interests between parents and children. And I think it's likelier that young people, not people, who are raising families, will have the best insight into the, interests of children. Whereas if you, you were awarded five,
>> Speaker G: I think it's absurd to imagine that a, 24 year old recent college graduate has a better assessment of the interests of my own children than I do. And I say this with all Due respect to 24 year old recent college graduates of whom I hope to be the parent of in nine years or
>> Abraham Hamilton III: so, I think parents generally confuse the interests of their family with the interests of their children. And part of our goal I think as parents, but also as a society, is trying to make sure that children aren't the hostages of their parents as much as we rely on parents to raise them.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Now did you hear that? So the law professor Samuel Moyn is the one who's saying that his idea, this is his brilliant. And I want you to know, that this was a part of a podcast episode during which Samuel Moyn is lamenting the fact that he feels like older, people are hoarding over younger people.
>> Joseph Parker: Right.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: So this Kent professor of law and history, you know, all of his studies of history and all of his studies of law and all of his efforts to train the next generation of lawyers. Now how many Supreme Court justices come from your law, have come from Your law school? M. His idea is. Well, he says we should weight the votes of younger voters. Now, just to be crystal clear about what he means by that, he means that younger voters. Votes should count more than older people's votes in our country. Think about that. on what basis? Oh, no, not protecting. Oh, no, no. He doesn't mean that older people are protecting younger people. He. He means young. Older people are keeping young people oppressed. That. That's what he means. I mean, he's. He has a new book that he just put out that says Jared, that the title of it is this Gerontocracy in America how the Old Are, Hoarding Power and Wealth and what to Do About It. Hoarding Power and Wealth. So his magnum opus of an idea is that we need to weight the votes of younger American voters so that their votes count more than older Americans. Now, he didn't specify. What is this cutoff for older and younger. I want you to hear what I'm saying. He wants to wait the votes for Americans who. Many of whom just finished the Tide Pod challenge. Y' all know what that is. And the reason why he wants to wait the votes for younger people is because the, younger voters. So these are people who will be over the age of 18, who have the legal right to vote. Younger voters, votes should be weighted more heavily because they should be voting as proxies for children who are too young to vote. Right. And his reasoning for that is. Did you hear him? His reasoning for that is that younger American voters will have a better understanding of. Of the interests of the children in our country. Yeah, y', all, I'm gonna say this, and I'm gonna play it again for you. Yeah, yeah, yeah. To which Ross do thought interrupts and say, wait a minute. Wait a minute. Why should we assume that younger Americans will know better what the children in our country want than their parents? Why not? If your idea is to weight the votes in favor in such a way to where the children in America are represented, why not allow the children's parents votes to be weighted to represent their interest? And did you hear his response? His response was, and, guys, I cannot make this stuff up. I'm saying this. And then I'm gonna play it again so you can hear it just in case you missed it. He literally said out of his mouth, Bobby. He had the audacity to say out of his mouth that younger voters, especially those who are not raising families, he said that have. Will have the best. This is what he said. Will have the Best insights into children's interests. That's what he said. To which Ross Duthard says, what, are you kidding me? You know, no shade to the 24 year old, you know, recent college graduate. But I think I know better what my children interests are than a 24 year old who don't live with me and ain't never met my children. To which Samuel Moyn, Professor Moyn goes in and says, well, you see, parents have this little problem. You see, parents have this little pesky idea. They tend to, you know, conflate their interest for their family with the interests of their children, saying that, you know, these parents tend to think that what they think is best for their family, that their children agree with it. But the reality is, this is what Moyne said. Children's interests are divergent from their parents. Guys, he said that out loud. To which my immediate thought was, cole, you stupid as well as famo. How do you know? How do you know? You are making all kind of assumptions and presumptions. You have all kind of things that you are assuming in this. And then he goes on to say, and this is how he ends his I'm sorry, but his not just stupid, insidious remarks. He says, quote, a part of our goal is to make sure, he says, as parents and as society, that a part of our goal is to make sure children aren't the hostages of their parents, end quote. The hostages of their parents. Now I want to remind this ain't no, this is not no young kid. This is, this is the Kent professor, of law and history at Yale, university. But this is nothing more than demonic ideology we just talked about. Second Corinthians, chapter 10. This is vain imaginations, demonic speculations, but they're being laundered through academia. This is read Isaiah, chapter one, two and three. What? Why do we have things like, oh, I don't know, certain ages before children could have driver's license. Why do we have things about, you know, you have to be a certain age to make certain decisions with your life. Why do insurance companies charge more money for younger people? Is it because they're more risky or less risky as drivers? Yet Mr. Moyn here is saying that, but the society needs to franchise, enfranchise the children. And the best way to do so, you know, since we're not going to let children vote, although I wonder if, if Samuel Moore would be in favor just letting the children vote for themselves.
Ross Dutch proposes assigning younger voters proxy votes for children's interests
He says we need to let younger people vote with weighted votes because they need to be the Proxies for the interests of the children, you see, because we don't want to have a society where the children are the hostages of their parents. Hostages. What does that sound like to you? What does that sound like to you? Now, now that I've explained that, I'm gonna play it one more time. I'm not gonna play it again after this. I want you to listen again after I explain that. Because I know sometimes, we can miss some things as we're listening. I'm gonna play it again. Listen to it closely again. It is clip number five. Let's play it one more time. Clip five. Go.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: I've gotten in some hot water for proposing we consider overweighting the votes of younger people or assigning the youngest eligible voters proxy votes for the unrepresented children of our country. so those are edgy.
>> Speaker G: Ah, why not assign them to those children's parents?
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Well, because there's a divergence of interest between parents and children. And I think it's likelier that young people, not people who are raising families, will have the best insight into the, interests of children. Whereas if you were awarded five receives,
>> Speaker G: I think it's absurd to imagine that a, 24 year old recent college graduate has a better assessment of the interests of my own children than I do. And I say this with all Due respect to 24 year old recent college graduates of whom I hope to be the parent of in nine years or so.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: I think parents generally confuse the interests of their family with the interests of their children. And part of our goal, I think as parents, but also as a society is trying to make sure that children aren't the hostages of their parents as much as we rely on parents to raise them.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Now, did y' all hear all of that? Now this, this is wild, guys. This is wild. But this is what these people really believe. This is what these people really believe. When you see policies and, and efforts made to separate children from their parents. You know the whole thing about you're separating families at the border. No, this guy wants to separate families in America. He, he wants to separate households via vote. Does that sound familiar to you? Some of the same types of things that was poised or sorry Presented by Moses Mordecai, Marks Levy and Frederick Engels. Children don't need to have a particular affinity and relationship and investment in their, their biological families. They need to be made children of the state. The 24 year old the bet. The ones who best represent the interests of children must be younger voters. And notice what he said. Younger Voters who are not raising families themselves. Did you hear that? That. That was one of his caveats. Who are not raising families themselves. They will know best what children's interests are. To which Ross Dutch says, that's absurd, man. That's absurd, my boy, because it is absurd. Now, Ross, do thought knows it's absurd. I know it's absurd. You know it's absurd. But how many others do you think know it's absurd? All around our country, how many will say, well, this is the Yale. Yale professor of Law and history. Surely his idea has merit because of his pedigree. Right? Right. Surely, Abraham, you shouldn't be so quick to discount his ideas, because look at his academic achievement and the position that he holds within our society. Now add into your calculus what we've been talking about over recent weeks concerning voluntary familial estrangement. Do you see the. The line of commonality that is flowing through all of this? Guys, my man was there with his tie on and his. His glasses, you know, no shade to the spectacled. You know what I mean? No shade to that. And he's speaking in calm and caustic tones and literally seeping the odes of hell. I mean, screw tape and wormwood are all throughout his commentary, but it's incumbent upon us to have the discernment necessary to where we destroy Laggy's mas like that.
>> : AFA action takes attacks on the family seriously. The enemies of the family constantly employ new tactics to try to sneak past our radar. They know if we stand together, their evil plans will fail. Your gift to AFA action allows us to stay vigilant against their onslaught. And if you give this month, you'll receive access to the Cultural Institute video when your faith is illegal by Frank Harbour on AFA stream as our thanks, you can make your gift [email protected] Ed Vitagliano, author of the article Foundations from the past.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: I wanted readers to understand that the founders of our nation knew that for this amazing experiment in liberty to succeed, the Christian faith and the morality that flows from it had to exist at the heart of the republic.
>> : It's a special issue of the Stand magazine, Toward a more perfect Union, [email protected]
>> Abraham Hamilton III: thestand the Hamilton Corner podcast and one minute commentaries are [email protected] back to the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
Hamilton: How did all these younger people get so enamored with socialism
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. You know, I'm just. I'm still reeling from that kind of, you know, intellectual drivel that is bandied about in our society. And part of the reason why I'm doing this because many of you, like me, will say, well, man, how did all these younger people get so enamored with socialism? This is how. This is how Marx postulated that the family was a bourgeoisie concept in which children were oppressed by their parents, wives were oppressed by their husbands, and we need to utilize societal measures to alleviate that oppression. He used different words, but he's communicating the same ideas. Moyne is. We don't want to have a society where children are the hostages of their parents. And so to liberate them, we're going to have unrelated 20 somethings and 18 year olds and 19 year olds who will have their votes weighted because they will have the best interest of other people's children in mind. Guys, that's what he's saying, man. That's what he's saying. And no matter how you cut it, when it boils down to brass, taxes, taxes where rubber meets the road, we are going to come down to whether man's word or God's word will prevail. That's the bottom line, you know.
Justice Antonin Scalia explains why our US Constitution is special
I came across a blast from the past this week and I want to share it with you. The late Justice Anthony Antonin Scalia. In his in as only he can, I found, some footage of him from C Span where he's speaking before a Senate committee, kind of similar to what, Justice Amy, Coney Barrett did not too long ago. But notice there's a little different presentation. Justice Scalia goes on to explain, well, you want to know why our US Constitution is special. And he provides an explanation that you don't hear this type of clarity and poignant articulation, articulation very often. And I thought it was important m to bring to our audience here, because he hits the nail on the head and our bill, of rights is important, but that's not the main game. That's not the reason why our Constitution is special. Other, nations have had and do have quote, unquote, articulations of rights. But our founders, as you're gonna hear Justice, Justice Scalia, the late Justice Scalia explain, our founders would say that those amount to nothing more than mere parchment guarantees meaning. And that's on paper. That ain't or that ain't in real life. Blast from the past, Justice Antonin Scalia. Listen to this. It's two parts, but I'll start with part one. Clip number six. Clip six. Go.
>> Joseph Parker: If you think that a Bill of Rights is what sets us apart, you're crazy. Every banana republic in the world has a bill of rights. Every president for life has a bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights of the former evil empire, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, was much better than ours. I mean it literally. It was much better. We guarantee freedom of speech and of the press. Big deal. They guaranteed freedom of speech, of the press, of street demonstrations and protests. And anyone who is. Who is caught trying to suppress criticism of the government will be called to account.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Whoa.
>> Joseph Parker: that is wonderful stuff. Of course, just words on paper. What our framers would have called a parchment guarantee. And the reason is that the real constitution of the Soviet Union. You think of the word constitution, it doesn't mean a bill. It means structure. Say a person has a sound constitution. Has a sound structure. The real constitution of the Soviet Union, which is what our framers debated that that whole summer in Philadelphia in 1787, they didn't talk about the Bill of Rights. That was an afterthought, wasn't it? That constitution of the Soviet Union did not prevent the centralization of power in one person or in one party. And when that happens, the game is over. The Bill of Rights is just what our framers would call a parchment guarantee.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Did you hear that? It's not merely the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is important, yes, but every banana republic has their version of a Bill of rights. The genius of our constitution is the separation of powers, the decentralization of power. Justice Scalia continues. Clip number seven. Clip seven. Go.
The real key to the distinctiveness of America is the structure of our government
>> Joseph Parker: So the real key to, the distinctiveness of America is the structure of our government. One part of it, of course, is the independence of the judiciary. But there's. There's. There's a lot more. There are very few countries in the world, for example, that. That have a bicameral legislature. Oh, England has a House of Lords for the time being, but the House of Lords has no substantial power. They can just make the commons pass a bill a second time. France has a senate. It's honorific. Italy has a senate. It's honorification. Very few countries have two separate bodies in the legislature equally powerful. That's a lot of trouble, as you gentlemen doubtless know, to get the same language through two different bodies elected in a different fashion. Very few countries in the world have a separately elected, chief executive. Sometimes I go to Europe to talk about separation of powers, and when I get there, I find that all I'm talking about is independence of the judiciary, because the Europeans don't even try to divide the two political powers. The two political branches. The Legislature and the chief executive. In all of the parliamentary countries, the chief executive is the creature of the legislature. There's never any disagreement between them and the prime minister, as there is sometimes between you and the president. When there's a disagreement, they just kick them out. They have a no confidence vote, a new election, and they get a prime minister who agrees with the legislature.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: You see? And that's exactly how it functions in the parliamentary countries. Generally speaking, they are. The head of state is selected by the parliament. There's not this division of authority, the key to the specialness, if you will, of the United States? Structure, governmental structure. And this is why I always explain that our Constitution must be understood and interpreted in light of the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence is the what of the United States of America, and the Constitution is the how. That is what it is. And what makes our governmental structure special is the decentralization of power, the separation of powers, the checks and balances that flow federally as a result of the separation of powers. Now, if you study our history, you study James Madison's notes on our Constitution. These are some of the things that, were arrived at early on in our discourse following the prayer meeting prompted by, Ben Franklin's, rise in motion in the summer of 1787 in Pennsylvania. Why was the separation of power such a central feature of our constitutional formation? It's because our founders understood the sin nature of man.
>> Speaker G: Mm.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: What is it that the Democratic Socialists of America are seeking to do? Oh, that's right. They want to reduce that separation of power. Get rid of the Senate altogether. No longer have a bicameral deliberating legislature with a president with veto power. And I know for a lot of people, we kind of get caught up in. The Europeans talk about this a lot, a governmental gridlock. But the reality is, gridlock, as is commonly understood in our system, is not a bug. It's the feature. It's made to be that way so that it is very difficult for legislation to be passed, because the founders did not anticipated that the federal government would be the least involved form of government in American daily life. And when we have people like myself, I advocate for a limited government, but it is the separation of powers that sets our nation apart. But those who have a regressive worldview, they want to consolidate power. They want to abandon the Senate. The Democratic socialists of America want to do get rid of the Senate altogether. And, in fact, get rid of the Supreme Court as it's currently functioning. Get rid of the presidency as it currently functions. And we have an expanded unicameral legislature, and then the judiciary and the presidency are subordinate to that legislature, just like European nations. Isn't that interesting? I thought it was important to highlight that for you because we used to do this thing in our country called civics and teaching civics. That we really don't do too much of that anymore. We used to have an understanding that if there was a problem that persisted in our communities, that we, the people would step up and address whatever the problem is. But now we kind of have, a stasis that says, well, we need to get government involved. That did not used to be the American way. But in order to get back what I hope you can see from this, in order to get back there, it's not merely, an understanding that we need to get back to a better government. We need to come back to understanding, Understanding man's sinful inclinations. Because the only way utopian visions of any society can persist is if people deny the reality of man's sinful nature. That's the only way. That is the only way. So I thought it was worthwhile to, offer that reminder and to welcome our audience here to, become. Re. initiated to that reality. You know, I mean, I have so much more my stack, and I don't know if I'll get to it all.
Anthony Fauci's government phone was finally turned over
like, for example, you have,
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Anthony Fauci's government phone was finally turned over. And it's interesting. There are only three contacts listed by names. All of the rest of the contacts have numbers in them. But there are over 34,000 text messages and 522 voicemails. But the contacts just so happen to not have any. Surely nobody tried to delete any evidence from the phone before it got turned in.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Surely.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Right.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: I mean, but the text messages, man, this is. This is disgusting. And I'll get right to some of the text. Jeff put the screenshots on because Fauci and others were publicly, saying the Shmovich shots are just fine. Pregnant women can take them. But behind the scenes, Foushee was texting people and expressing concern for the impact that the shots would have on pregnant women. Jeffrey, you throwing the screen the green one first with the green background. And this is a message from Anthony Fauci. If you're watching the show, look on the right side of the screen where Fauci says this quote. I asked around a bit more, and another issue came up that you need to be aware of. Since many people have significant cytokine storms and fever after the second dose. This theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the first trimester of, pregnancy, end quote. Now, this is what this man is saying in private while he is going out in public and saying, oh, there's nothing wrong with the shots. Pregnant women can take the shots. You know, we got another one. Put the other one on the screen, Jeff. Because during Mr. Robinette's time, his surgeon general was a man by the name of Vivek Murthy and Vivek Murphy and Dr. Fauci were discussing the concerns that they had that the shot might even result in mutilating. Mutilating the babies inside of the pregnant moms. The top message from Dr. Murthy to Dr. Fauci, quote, this is really helpful. Thanks. I've been hearing the concern about the MRNA causing mutations, causing mutations in a developing fetus as well. That's a really good point. Read the cytokine storm post. Second dose.
WHO advises against pregnant women taking Moderna vaccine because of lack of data
Next message from Murthy to Fauci, quote, tony Rochelle, did you see this announcement today from WHO saying they advise against pregnant women taking the Moderna vaccine because of a lack of data. It has led to a flurry of questions. What is your take? I imagine we will all get asked about this in quote, now, do you know people, know moms who took these shots while they were pregnant? Do you know moms who miscarried as a result of, or should I say shortly, after taking these shots? I can't imagine the pain of the miscarriage m in the first place, but then to learn, then to learn. Fauci, with his sunglasses and wanting to be the most famous man in the world, is expressing these concerns in private but in public saying, oh, they're safe. People just taking him at his word. And this is further evidence that Anthony Fauci deserves to spend the rest of his life in prison. And the fact that that that is not going to happen is quite disconcerting. But there is one he won't escape. There's one that he won't escape. The views and opinions expressed in this broadcast may not necessarily reflect those of the American Family association or American Family Radio.
Hamilton: God has called us to be ambassadors even in this dark moment
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Darkness is not an affirmative force. It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: This is the, Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite, delivering people
>> Abraham Hamilton III: out of the bondage of mainstream media and the philosophies of this world.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: God has called you and me to be his ambassadors even in this dark moment. Let's not miss our moment.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: And now, the, Hamilton Corner.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Good evening everyone.
Many of you are making your transition from part time jobs to full time jobs
Welcome to the Hamilton Corner. My name is Abraham Hamilton iii. I am the host of this program, joined by the Corner contingent right across from me. My man, 100 grand. Mr. Bobby Rosa is manning the board. And in the screening room we have produce extraordinaire, often imitated but never duplicated, the real J. Mac. And we are ready to rock and roll with today's edition of the program. At this very moment, many of you, if not most of you, are making your transition from your part time where you generate an income, to your full time jobs where you cultivate an outcome. And as you do so, I want to remind you to do so with intentionality, understanding the primacy that God places on family and welcoming his view as communicated to us through his word to govern, guard and to guide your engagements. As the Apostle Peter said, all things that pertain to life and godliness, he's provided for us in his holy word, that illuminates to our minds via his spirit, where the spirit of God will remind us of all things that Jesus taught. And it is imperative that we embrace it. I am, going to explain as we go throughout the show today and provide an example, a pretty pertinent example of what happens when you have, the hiss and the suggestions of the talking snake laundered through academia. You know, there is a concerted effort to deceive palpable deception. That's why we did the show a few days ago about the Gibeonites, who were actually Hivites, who acted as if they came from a faraway place solely to deceive the Israelites to making a covenant with them. And that deception is plenteous in our society. But as you are making your transition, you have the opportunity to execute the King's commission starting right in your home. It's vitally important that we are ambassadors of the king of glory in the highways and byways of life and society. But we cannot seek to do so. And let me say it this way, we can, we should not seek to do so at the expense of our homes and our families. We have to, get back to the reality, that the gospel of the kingdom of God advances a person at a time, a neighbor at a time, a family at a time. a brother who has been a hero in the faith to me, who has become a friend, recently is Dr. Del Tackett, formerly of Focus, on the Family, who has been on the show before. I was on his show earlier this week. and he explains how for the first three centuries of, the NewSong Testament church that would grew from 12 men to the entirety of the Roman Empire expanded In those first 300 years from neighbor to neighbor. That's how it grew. It wasn't this, it didn't have a marketing budget. They didn't have a slick PR campaign with a spokesman tuning in now. You know, didn't have, didn't have a tour with lights, camera, action. They had people who loved Jesus enough to take him at his word and love their neighbors enough to recognize that the greatest thing I could ever do for my neighbor is communicate to them the necessity, of having eternal life. There's only one name under heaven by which men must be saved, and that is the name of Jesus Christ. That is what we get the privilege to do. Starting right in our homes and working outwardly from there. To the word of God we go. Second Corinthians, chapter 10. Second Corinthians, chapter 10, verses 3 through 5. Very familiar passage of scripture. This is not going to be novel to many of you, but this is so necessary. It's just fun how these people keep, recirculating. We got TVs on in the studio. You got Austan Golsbee on one of the screens. And he worked in the Obama administration. So now he's the chairman of the Federal bank, the Federal Reserve bank of Chicago. Well, geez, I wonder how that happens. Isn't it amazing how these people keep popping up in different places? You know, it's amazing, to the word of God. Second Corinthians, chapter 10, verses 3 through 5. This is what God's holy word says. For though we, though we walk in the flesh, we do not war according to the flesh. For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but divinely powerful for the destruction of forces. So some translations transliterate, that verbiage as to the destruction, to the demolition and demolishing of strongholds. All right, verse five. For we are destroying speculations, or other transliterations, say their imagination. So we are destroying speculations and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God. We are taking every thought captive to the obedience of Christ. This is so vitally important because, much of what is promulgated against the Lord's people in this time is to get us to conflate what is real and what is not real. For when the scripture says, for we walk in the flesh, we do not war according to the flesh. For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but are divinely powerful. Dr. Rathbun would say that the weapons of our warfare are not of this world, but they are of the real world. The real world is the spiritual world. That is the real world. That is the world where we who have placed our faith in Jesus Christ for your salvation will spend eternity and enjoy eternal life. Those who reject the free gift of salvation will spend their eternities in the real world, but suffering eternal damnation. It is vitally important that we understand what the real world truly, truly is.
The weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, they are divinely powerful
All right. The weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, meaning they are not natural in origin. Their potency isn't governed by the natural order. human familiarity doesn't dictate, the potency, the effectiveness of the utilization of our weaponry, in contrast to that natural orientation disposition the Lord has revealed to us in his holy word. But that the weapons of our warfare, which are not fleshly, they are divinely powerful. They are mighty through God. That reference to divinely powerful is a communication of their origin. Their origin is in God. Their capacity is dictated by God. Their utilization is ordained by God. Their effectiveness is stewarded and shepherded by God. But it's, incumbent upon us to understand that, to believe that, to live as if we believe that, and to implement our divinely powerful weaponry as if we do believe that. This reference to the capacity of our warfare, in their ability to destroy fortresses, to demolish strongholds. The Lord wouldn't have said that they were strongholds or fortresses if they were not fortress like, if they were not strongholds. The capacity for these strongholds to grip us have that capacity from our vantage point. But the weaponry that the Lord has afforded us has the capacity to obliterate them. And application of this weaponry is what enables us to do what verse five says. To destroy speculations, not entertain them. Not well. Everybody has a reasonable opinion. Not well. Surely I can see the value in that. No, no, no. When we recognize that these offerings are rooted in. In an antichrist disposition, there's no tiddlywinks to be played. Now we destroy those speculations. And I've Explained before, the Greek word for speculations there, or imaginations in the King James is logismos, which is related to the root word from which we get the word logic from much of, the warfare. And this is not to minimize or to say that this is the exclusive understanding, but much of the warfare that we engage in is to confront and to destroy antichrist ideologies that are offered in our society, to bind people, that become strongholds in people's lives. Have you noticed, this is just an example. Have you noticed how reflexively people who support the intentional slaughter of unborn children in the womb, have you noticed how vehemently many of them are gripped by that position? Do you think they've arrived at that fervent position merely by intellectual reasoning? No, no, no. To persuade men to be willing to encourage and even provide money to have their own offspring murdered for moms, women who are moms. This is when I. When I have the privilege of meeting and talking to pregnant women. I don't say, you will be a mom. I tell them, there are moms. When you have the little baby growing inside of you, you are a mom. But to have the ideologies that would convince moms to go and destroy their own children, you think that's merely the product of rationality? It's not. There's a demonic ideology at the root that undergirds all of this, not least to mention, and I won't get into the science on this, but when you have a mom and the baby is growing and her capacity to nurse her child is growing, and then to eliminate that, how that impacts, healthy breast tissue and how you can trace the ascendancy of things like breast cancer to the ascendancy of abortion in our society. But do you think that's the product of rationality alone? It's not. But the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but they're divinely power. They're divinely powerful. I'm sorry for the destruction of fortresses. And because of that, we, the people of God, have the opportunity, the wherewithal, the privileges, prerogative, and the responsibility to destroy logismas ideologies that would dare rival the truth of our Lord. And we do this not because we're, you know, societal, crusaders. We don't do this because we want to assert our own unilateral notions of rightness. No. We do this because we love our God with all our heart, soul, minds and strength. We love God, the true and living God, with all our heart, soul, minds and strength. And the Second is like it. We love our neighbor as ourselves. The truth of the matter is that the harvest is plentiful. Plentiful, but the laborers are few. Many in our world have eyes that are blinded, that are blinded. And God has dispatched his people as his hands and feet to be vessels through whom he opens blind eyes. That's why we destroy the vain ideologies. That's why we pray without ceasing. That's why we're willing to engage, even when it's not convenient for us. That's why our trips to the grocery store are not just trips to the grocery store. That's why when God has blessed us to live where we live, that we recognize man. It is by God's divine providence and assignment that I am placed where I am placed. And my neighbor is across the street from me. And my neighbor is beside me and another on the other side of me. That my life is a life that I live on mission. Because I recognize life on this side of eternity is fleeting and the evidence of the real world is imminent. We live in light of the real world. We live in light of eternity. And it is the love of God that compels us to compel men to be reconciled to God. Within all of the uncertainty that surrounds us. It's all the more reason, with fervor and zeal, with an urgency about ourselves, that we communicate that there's one name under heaven by which men must be saved. And when these antichrist ideology, whatever ism schism you want to mention that may not have rhythm, that, we examine it under the white hot scrutiny of God's holy word and cause those Antichrist ideologies to fold before the king of glory.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: A discipleship minute with Joseph Parker.
>> Joseph Parker: We were made to do the will of God. That's our design. That's what will really fulfill us, carrying out what he's called us to do. Whereas as much as we think we know what we want to do, we really don't. I think of the message of that great theologian Dr. Seuss, of course. The story of green eggs and ham. An interesting story. Sam, I am chases and chases the fella trying to convince him to eat green eggs and ham. And when he finally gives in, he finally decided, I'll eat them to get rid of Sam. I am. And when he tastes them, he realized, man, I like these. That's a beautiful example of the way the gospel is for people. When people finally surrender to Jesus, they come to realize Jesus is what I've
>> Abraham Hamilton III: been looking for my whole life.
>> Joseph Parker: And it's like something inside of them screams out, this is it. How important it is that we're about God's business, helping people to find out what life is all about. It's knowing Jesus and following him as well.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: I'm Rick Scarborough, and this is my take.
The 2026 World Cup brought hundreds of thousands of visitors from 48 nations
The 2026 World cup brought hundreds of thousands of visitors from 48 nations to 11American cities. Each arrived carrying an image of America shaped by headlines, politics and stereotypes. And most left surprised, saying America's nothing like the media told us. Fans marveled at the everyday things we take for granted. The freedom of travel, overflowing superstores, oversized meal portions, and above all, the warmth and hospitality of the people they met here. The missing story isn't the scoreboard. It's how quickly firsthand experience overturned expectation, replacing caricature with genuine admiration for a great nation. When a stranger's open heart meets a stranger's open hand, the lies of the headlines fall away. The world sees the goodness we've let politics obscure. I'm Rick Scarborough, and that's my take,
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Shining light into the darkness. This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
Abraham Hamilton III plays clip of Ross Douthat interviewing Samuel Moyn
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III here. I'm going to play something for you
>> Joseph Parker: now,
>> Abraham Hamilton III: and I want you to pay close attention to it, and I want you to see if you're able to detect the hiss of the talking snake as you listen. What I'm going to share with you is a clip from an interview, by Ross Douthot, who was at this time, and recently he made a change. And I explained that, a NewSong York Times columnist and an author, who is moving over to CBS to work on their 60 Minutes program. Ross, too, thought is, is understood to be conservative. and he is interviewing the Kent professor of law and history named Samuel Moyn. Samuel Moyn. All right. Samuel Moyn has, you know, the Ivy League pedigree. His undergraduate, I'm sorry, his Juris Doctorate degree came from Harvard Law School. He has a PhD in history from the University of California. And as I mentioned, he is the Kent professor of Law and History. That is a particular, distinguished title that he bears as he works at Yale University's law school. He's one of the people, if you would send your child to Yale Law School, he would be one of the people who would be teaching your child at the time that they might have made it to make it to law school. They probably would be adults by then. But I want you to hear because, Ross Douthat is responding to the Idea that Samuel Moyn, who is presenting. And just so you can distinguish the voices, Samuel Moyn is a person who said, well, you know, I girded myself with a little bit of hot water by espousing these ideas us. And I want you to listen, listen closely because these are the types of ideas, guys, that are being filtered through our society. Like, if you've ever wondered how could these people, they're so educated, how could they come to these conclusions? And as you listen, I also want you to consider, what does God's word have to say about any of this? All right, listen closely. This clip is going to be about a minute and 17 seconds long. This is Samuel Moyn espousing some, well, let me just let you listen to it and then I'll provide commentary thereafter. Listen to and watch clip number five. Clip five, go.
Professor Samuel Moyn says we should weight the votes of younger voters
>> Abraham Hamilton III: I've gotten in some hot water for proposing we consider overweighting the. The votes of younger people are assigning the youngest eligible voters proxy votes for the unrepresented children of our country. so those are edgy.
>> Speaker G: Ah, why not assign them to those children's parents?
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Well, because there's a divergence of interests between parents and children. And I think it's likelier that young people, not people, who are raising families, will have the best insight into the, interests of children. Whereas if you, you were awarded five,
>> Speaker G: I think it's absurd to imagine that a, 24 year old recent college graduate has a better assessment of the interests of my own children than I do. And I say this with all Due respect to 24 year old recent college graduates of whom I hope to be the parent of in nine years or
>> Abraham Hamilton III: so, I think parents generally confuse the interests of their family with the interests of their children. And part of our goal I think as parents, but also as a society, is trying to make sure that children aren't the hostages of their parents as much as we rely on parents to raise them.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Now did you hear that? So the law professor Samuel Moyn is the one who's saying that his idea, this is his brilliant. And I want you to know, that this was a part of a podcast episode during which Samuel Moyn is lamenting the fact that he feels like older, people are hoarding over younger people.
>> Joseph Parker: Right.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: So this Kent professor of law and history, you know, all of his studies of history and all of his studies of law and all of his efforts to train the next generation of lawyers. Now how many Supreme Court justices come from your law, have come from Your law school? M. His idea is. Well, he says we should weight the votes of younger voters. Now, just to be crystal clear about what he means by that, he means that younger voters. Votes should count more than older people's votes in our country. Think about that. on what basis? Oh, no, not protecting. Oh, no, no. He doesn't mean that older people are protecting younger people. He. He means young. Older people are keeping young people oppressed. That. That's what he means. I mean, he's. He has a new book that he just put out that says Jared, that the title of it is this Gerontocracy in America how the Old Are, Hoarding Power and Wealth and what to Do About It. Hoarding Power and Wealth. So his magnum opus of an idea is that we need to weight the votes of younger American voters so that their votes count more than older Americans. Now, he didn't specify. What is this cutoff for older and younger. I want you to hear what I'm saying. He wants to wait the votes for Americans who. Many of whom just finished the Tide Pod challenge. Y' all know what that is. And the reason why he wants to wait the votes for younger people is because the, younger voters. So these are people who will be over the age of 18, who have the legal right to vote. Younger voters, votes should be weighted more heavily because they should be voting as proxies for children who are too young to vote. Right. And his reasoning for that is. Did you hear him? His reasoning for that is that younger American voters will have a better understanding of. Of the interests of the children in our country. Yeah, y', all, I'm gonna say this, and I'm gonna play it again for you. Yeah, yeah, yeah. To which Ross do thought interrupts and say, wait a minute. Wait a minute. Why should we assume that younger Americans will know better what the children in our country want than their parents? Why not? If your idea is to weight the votes in favor in such a way to where the children in America are represented, why not allow the children's parents votes to be weighted to represent their interest? And did you hear his response? His response was, and, guys, I cannot make this stuff up. I'm saying this. And then I'm gonna play it again so you can hear it just in case you missed it. He literally said out of his mouth, Bobby. He had the audacity to say out of his mouth that younger voters, especially those who are not raising families, he said that have. Will have the best. This is what he said. Will have the Best insights into children's interests. That's what he said. To which Ross Duthard says, what, are you kidding me? You know, no shade to the 24 year old, you know, recent college graduate. But I think I know better what my children interests are than a 24 year old who don't live with me and ain't never met my children. To which Samuel Moyn, Professor Moyn goes in and says, well, you see, parents have this little problem. You see, parents have this little pesky idea. They tend to, you know, conflate their interest for their family with the interests of their children, saying that, you know, these parents tend to think that what they think is best for their family, that their children agree with it. But the reality is, this is what Moyne said. Children's interests are divergent from their parents. Guys, he said that out loud. To which my immediate thought was, cole, you stupid as well as famo. How do you know? How do you know? You are making all kind of assumptions and presumptions. You have all kind of things that you are assuming in this. And then he goes on to say, and this is how he ends his I'm sorry, but his not just stupid, insidious remarks. He says, quote, a part of our goal is to make sure, he says, as parents and as society, that a part of our goal is to make sure children aren't the hostages of their parents, end quote. The hostages of their parents. Now I want to remind this ain't no, this is not no young kid. This is, this is the Kent professor, of law and history at Yale, university. But this is nothing more than demonic ideology we just talked about. Second Corinthians, chapter 10. This is vain imaginations, demonic speculations, but they're being laundered through academia. This is read Isaiah, chapter one, two and three. What? Why do we have things like, oh, I don't know, certain ages before children could have driver's license. Why do we have things about, you know, you have to be a certain age to make certain decisions with your life. Why do insurance companies charge more money for younger people? Is it because they're more risky or less risky as drivers? Yet Mr. Moyn here is saying that, but the society needs to franchise, enfranchise the children. And the best way to do so, you know, since we're not going to let children vote, although I wonder if, if Samuel Moore would be in favor just letting the children vote for themselves.
Ross Dutch proposes assigning younger voters proxy votes for children's interests
He says we need to let younger people vote with weighted votes because they need to be the Proxies for the interests of the children, you see, because we don't want to have a society where the children are the hostages of their parents. Hostages. What does that sound like to you? What does that sound like to you? Now, now that I've explained that, I'm gonna play it one more time. I'm not gonna play it again after this. I want you to listen again after I explain that. Because I know sometimes, we can miss some things as we're listening. I'm gonna play it again. Listen to it closely again. It is clip number five. Let's play it one more time. Clip five. Go.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: I've gotten in some hot water for proposing we consider overweighting the votes of younger people or assigning the youngest eligible voters proxy votes for the unrepresented children of our country. so those are edgy.
>> Speaker G: Ah, why not assign them to those children's parents?
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Well, because there's a divergence of interest between parents and children. And I think it's likelier that young people, not people who are raising families, will have the best insight into the, interests of children. Whereas if you were awarded five receives,
>> Speaker G: I think it's absurd to imagine that a, 24 year old recent college graduate has a better assessment of the interests of my own children than I do. And I say this with all Due respect to 24 year old recent college graduates of whom I hope to be the parent of in nine years or so.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: I think parents generally confuse the interests of their family with the interests of their children. And part of our goal, I think as parents, but also as a society is trying to make sure that children aren't the hostages of their parents as much as we rely on parents to raise them.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Now, did y' all hear all of that? Now this, this is wild, guys. This is wild. But this is what these people really believe. This is what these people really believe. When you see policies and, and efforts made to separate children from their parents. You know the whole thing about you're separating families at the border. No, this guy wants to separate families in America. He, he wants to separate households via vote. Does that sound familiar to you? Some of the same types of things that was poised or sorry Presented by Moses Mordecai, Marks Levy and Frederick Engels. Children don't need to have a particular affinity and relationship and investment in their, their biological families. They need to be made children of the state. The 24 year old the bet. The ones who best represent the interests of children must be younger voters. And notice what he said. Younger Voters who are not raising families themselves. Did you hear that? That. That was one of his caveats. Who are not raising families themselves. They will know best what children's interests are. To which Ross Dutch says, that's absurd, man. That's absurd, my boy, because it is absurd. Now, Ross, do thought knows it's absurd. I know it's absurd. You know it's absurd. But how many others do you think know it's absurd? All around our country, how many will say, well, this is the Yale. Yale professor of Law and history. Surely his idea has merit because of his pedigree. Right? Right. Surely, Abraham, you shouldn't be so quick to discount his ideas, because look at his academic achievement and the position that he holds within our society. Now add into your calculus what we've been talking about over recent weeks concerning voluntary familial estrangement. Do you see the. The line of commonality that is flowing through all of this? Guys, my man was there with his tie on and his. His glasses, you know, no shade to the spectacled. You know what I mean? No shade to that. And he's speaking in calm and caustic tones and literally seeping the odes of hell. I mean, screw tape and wormwood are all throughout his commentary, but it's incumbent upon us to have the discernment necessary to where we destroy Laggy's mas like that.
>> : AFA action takes attacks on the family seriously. The enemies of the family constantly employ new tactics to try to sneak past our radar. They know if we stand together, their evil plans will fail. Your gift to AFA action allows us to stay vigilant against their onslaught. And if you give this month, you'll receive access to the Cultural Institute video when your faith is illegal by Frank Harbour on AFA stream as our thanks, you can make your gift [email protected] Ed Vitagliano, author of the article Foundations from the past.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: I wanted readers to understand that the founders of our nation knew that for this amazing experiment in liberty to succeed, the Christian faith and the morality that flows from it had to exist at the heart of the republic.
>> : It's a special issue of the Stand magazine, Toward a more perfect Union, [email protected]
>> Abraham Hamilton III: thestand the Hamilton Corner podcast and one minute commentaries are [email protected] back to the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
Hamilton: How did all these younger people get so enamored with socialism
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. You know, I'm just. I'm still reeling from that kind of, you know, intellectual drivel that is bandied about in our society. And part of the reason why I'm doing this because many of you, like me, will say, well, man, how did all these younger people get so enamored with socialism? This is how. This is how Marx postulated that the family was a bourgeoisie concept in which children were oppressed by their parents, wives were oppressed by their husbands, and we need to utilize societal measures to alleviate that oppression. He used different words, but he's communicating the same ideas. Moyne is. We don't want to have a society where children are the hostages of their parents. And so to liberate them, we're going to have unrelated 20 somethings and 18 year olds and 19 year olds who will have their votes weighted because they will have the best interest of other people's children in mind. Guys, that's what he's saying, man. That's what he's saying. And no matter how you cut it, when it boils down to brass, taxes, taxes where rubber meets the road, we are going to come down to whether man's word or God's word will prevail. That's the bottom line, you know.
Justice Antonin Scalia explains why our US Constitution is special
I came across a blast from the past this week and I want to share it with you. The late Justice Anthony Antonin Scalia. In his in as only he can, I found, some footage of him from C Span where he's speaking before a Senate committee, kind of similar to what, Justice Amy, Coney Barrett did not too long ago. But notice there's a little different presentation. Justice Scalia goes on to explain, well, you want to know why our US Constitution is special. And he provides an explanation that you don't hear this type of clarity and poignant articulation, articulation very often. And I thought it was important m to bring to our audience here, because he hits the nail on the head and our bill, of rights is important, but that's not the main game. That's not the reason why our Constitution is special. Other, nations have had and do have quote, unquote, articulations of rights. But our founders, as you're gonna hear Justice, Justice Scalia, the late Justice Scalia explain, our founders would say that those amount to nothing more than mere parchment guarantees meaning. And that's on paper. That ain't or that ain't in real life. Blast from the past, Justice Antonin Scalia. Listen to this. It's two parts, but I'll start with part one. Clip number six. Clip six. Go.
>> Joseph Parker: If you think that a Bill of Rights is what sets us apart, you're crazy. Every banana republic in the world has a bill of rights. Every president for life has a bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights of the former evil empire, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, was much better than ours. I mean it literally. It was much better. We guarantee freedom of speech and of the press. Big deal. They guaranteed freedom of speech, of the press, of street demonstrations and protests. And anyone who is. Who is caught trying to suppress criticism of the government will be called to account.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Whoa.
>> Joseph Parker: that is wonderful stuff. Of course, just words on paper. What our framers would have called a parchment guarantee. And the reason is that the real constitution of the Soviet Union. You think of the word constitution, it doesn't mean a bill. It means structure. Say a person has a sound constitution. Has a sound structure. The real constitution of the Soviet Union, which is what our framers debated that that whole summer in Philadelphia in 1787, they didn't talk about the Bill of Rights. That was an afterthought, wasn't it? That constitution of the Soviet Union did not prevent the centralization of power in one person or in one party. And when that happens, the game is over. The Bill of Rights is just what our framers would call a parchment guarantee.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Did you hear that? It's not merely the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is important, yes, but every banana republic has their version of a Bill of rights. The genius of our constitution is the separation of powers, the decentralization of power. Justice Scalia continues. Clip number seven. Clip seven. Go.
The real key to the distinctiveness of America is the structure of our government
>> Joseph Parker: So the real key to, the distinctiveness of America is the structure of our government. One part of it, of course, is the independence of the judiciary. But there's. There's. There's a lot more. There are very few countries in the world, for example, that. That have a bicameral legislature. Oh, England has a House of Lords for the time being, but the House of Lords has no substantial power. They can just make the commons pass a bill a second time. France has a senate. It's honorific. Italy has a senate. It's honorification. Very few countries have two separate bodies in the legislature equally powerful. That's a lot of trouble, as you gentlemen doubtless know, to get the same language through two different bodies elected in a different fashion. Very few countries in the world have a separately elected, chief executive. Sometimes I go to Europe to talk about separation of powers, and when I get there, I find that all I'm talking about is independence of the judiciary, because the Europeans don't even try to divide the two political powers. The two political branches. The Legislature and the chief executive. In all of the parliamentary countries, the chief executive is the creature of the legislature. There's never any disagreement between them and the prime minister, as there is sometimes between you and the president. When there's a disagreement, they just kick them out. They have a no confidence vote, a new election, and they get a prime minister who agrees with the legislature.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: You see? And that's exactly how it functions in the parliamentary countries. Generally speaking, they are. The head of state is selected by the parliament. There's not this division of authority, the key to the specialness, if you will, of the United States? Structure, governmental structure. And this is why I always explain that our Constitution must be understood and interpreted in light of the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence is the what of the United States of America, and the Constitution is the how. That is what it is. And what makes our governmental structure special is the decentralization of power, the separation of powers, the checks and balances that flow federally as a result of the separation of powers. Now, if you study our history, you study James Madison's notes on our Constitution. These are some of the things that, were arrived at early on in our discourse following the prayer meeting prompted by, Ben Franklin's, rise in motion in the summer of 1787 in Pennsylvania. Why was the separation of power such a central feature of our constitutional formation? It's because our founders understood the sin nature of man.
>> Speaker G: Mm.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: What is it that the Democratic Socialists of America are seeking to do? Oh, that's right. They want to reduce that separation of power. Get rid of the Senate altogether. No longer have a bicameral deliberating legislature with a president with veto power. And I know for a lot of people, we kind of get caught up in. The Europeans talk about this a lot, a governmental gridlock. But the reality is, gridlock, as is commonly understood in our system, is not a bug. It's the feature. It's made to be that way so that it is very difficult for legislation to be passed, because the founders did not anticipated that the federal government would be the least involved form of government in American daily life. And when we have people like myself, I advocate for a limited government, but it is the separation of powers that sets our nation apart. But those who have a regressive worldview, they want to consolidate power. They want to abandon the Senate. The Democratic socialists of America want to do get rid of the Senate altogether. And, in fact, get rid of the Supreme Court as it's currently functioning. Get rid of the presidency as it currently functions. And we have an expanded unicameral legislature, and then the judiciary and the presidency are subordinate to that legislature, just like European nations. Isn't that interesting? I thought it was important to highlight that for you because we used to do this thing in our country called civics and teaching civics. That we really don't do too much of that anymore. We used to have an understanding that if there was a problem that persisted in our communities, that we, the people would step up and address whatever the problem is. But now we kind of have, a stasis that says, well, we need to get government involved. That did not used to be the American way. But in order to get back what I hope you can see from this, in order to get back there, it's not merely, an understanding that we need to get back to a better government. We need to come back to understanding, Understanding man's sinful inclinations. Because the only way utopian visions of any society can persist is if people deny the reality of man's sinful nature. That's the only way. That is the only way. So I thought it was worthwhile to, offer that reminder and to welcome our audience here to, become. Re. initiated to that reality. You know, I mean, I have so much more my stack, and I don't know if I'll get to it all.
Anthony Fauci's government phone was finally turned over
like, for example, you have,
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Anthony Fauci's government phone was finally turned over. And it's interesting. There are only three contacts listed by names. All of the rest of the contacts have numbers in them. But there are over 34,000 text messages and 522 voicemails. But the contacts just so happen to not have any. Surely nobody tried to delete any evidence from the phone before it got turned in.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Surely.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Right.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: I mean, but the text messages, man, this is. This is disgusting. And I'll get right to some of the text. Jeff put the screenshots on because Fauci and others were publicly, saying the Shmovich shots are just fine. Pregnant women can take them. But behind the scenes, Foushee was texting people and expressing concern for the impact that the shots would have on pregnant women. Jeffrey, you throwing the screen the green one first with the green background. And this is a message from Anthony Fauci. If you're watching the show, look on the right side of the screen where Fauci says this quote. I asked around a bit more, and another issue came up that you need to be aware of. Since many people have significant cytokine storms and fever after the second dose. This theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the first trimester of, pregnancy, end quote. Now, this is what this man is saying in private while he is going out in public and saying, oh, there's nothing wrong with the shots. Pregnant women can take the shots. You know, we got another one. Put the other one on the screen, Jeff. Because during Mr. Robinette's time, his surgeon general was a man by the name of Vivek Murthy and Vivek Murphy and Dr. Fauci were discussing the concerns that they had that the shot might even result in mutilating. Mutilating the babies inside of the pregnant moms. The top message from Dr. Murthy to Dr. Fauci, quote, this is really helpful. Thanks. I've been hearing the concern about the MRNA causing mutations, causing mutations in a developing fetus as well. That's a really good point. Read the cytokine storm post. Second dose.
WHO advises against pregnant women taking Moderna vaccine because of lack of data
Next message from Murthy to Fauci, quote, tony Rochelle, did you see this announcement today from WHO saying they advise against pregnant women taking the Moderna vaccine because of a lack of data. It has led to a flurry of questions. What is your take? I imagine we will all get asked about this in quote, now, do you know people, know moms who took these shots while they were pregnant? Do you know moms who miscarried as a result of, or should I say shortly, after taking these shots? I can't imagine the pain of the miscarriage m in the first place, but then to learn, then to learn. Fauci, with his sunglasses and wanting to be the most famous man in the world, is expressing these concerns in private but in public saying, oh, they're safe. People just taking him at his word. And this is further evidence that Anthony Fauci deserves to spend the rest of his life in prison. And the fact that that that is not going to happen is quite disconcerting. But there is one he won't escape. There's one that he won't escape. The views and opinions expressed in this broadcast may not necessarily reflect those of the American Family association or American Family Radio.
0:00 - 15:00. 2 Corinthians 10:3-5. “Vain imaginations” are seemingly ubiquitous in 21st century America.
15:00 - 31:00. Samuel Moyn, Kent Professor of Law and History at Yale, provides an example of devilry laundered through academia.
31:00 - 48:00. The late Justice Antonin Scalia clearly articulates why the U.S. Constitution is more than a “parchment guarantee."
https://afafoundation.net/ | 1-800-326-4543 ext. 345
https://afr.net/BIBLESFORBABIES To donate call: 877-616-2396
Video Clip Links
Samuel Moyn
https://x.com/calebwait/status/2084643154180063494?s=43
Justice Antonin Scalia
0:00 - 15:00. 2 Corinthians 10:3-5. “Vain imaginations” are seemingly ubiquitous in 21st century America.
15:00 - 31:00. Samuel Moyn, Kent Professor of Law and History at Yale, provides an example of devilry laundered through academia.
31:00 - 48:00. The late Justice Antonin Scalia clearly articulates why the U.S. Constitution is more than a “parchment guarantee."
https://afafoundation.net/ | 1-800-326-4543 ext. 345
https://afr.net/BIBLESFORBABIES To donate call: 877-616-2396
Video Clip Links
Samuel Moyn
https://x.com/calebwait/status/2084643154180063494?s=43
Justice Antonin Scalia
Live
Did you know American Family Radio is listener-supported? Your monthly financial support will allow us to continue upholding Godly values through our numerous channels, like American Family Radio, One Million Moms, The Stand magazine, and many more.
Become a Great Commission Partner TODAY to help AFR transform culture by rebuilding the family. When you donate today, you’ll get access to:
