Abraham Hamilton III Darkness is not an affirmative force. It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light. This is the, Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio. It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite, delivering people out of the bondage of mainstream media and the philosophies of this world. God has called you and me to be his ambassadors, even in this dark moment. Let's not miss our moment. And now the Hamilton Corner. Good evening everybody. Welcome to the Hamilton Corner here on American Family Radio. I'm your host, Abraham Hamilton iii, joined by the corner contingent. Right across from me is my man, 100 grand, Mr. Bobby Roza. And in the screening room, produce extraordinaire. Often imitated, never duplicated. Y' all know what it is. It's the real J. Mac. Ladies and gentlemen. Not to be confused with the synthetic diet sucralose versions that Banti about, but the real deal. We're ready to rock and roll with today's edition of the program. At this very moment, many of you, if not most of you, are making your transition from your part time jobs where you generate an income, to your full time jobs where and through which you cultivate an outcome. And as you do so, I want to remind you to do so with intentionality. Being intentional about what you're going to do, having preceded, your engagement with prayer, having preceded it with planning, subjected to the lordship of Christ, of course, because what you do in your house is far more important than what goes on in the White House. And I say that with no intention whatsoever to denigrate or minimize the significance of what transpires at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. But I say it to emphasize the appropriate significance with which we should consider our engagements in our homes. If you look at the things that have transpired in our country, the retrenchments of the family correspond with the expansion of the Leviathan state. we see, the result of generations of ceding our children to an Antichrist. Frankly, government indoctrination complex has resulted in a populace that has a very hard time resisting, the fool's goal, that is a Marxist appeal, the fool's gold, that is, societal envy, you know, and covetousness. regardless of what is true, simply saying, well, somebody has that. Why can't I have that? To embrace kind of, not kind of, but to embrace an anti American ethos, that whatever issue is of concern or that may be of concern, the default response is look to the government for an answer. And that is not the American way, frankly. And it's not the biblical way. Government has its role, but it's very narrow and limited. But the capacity that we have as bearers of God's image is what, founded this nation with a biblical Protestant work ethic and understanding. that's just the truth of the history of this country. And what's happened over time is the execution of the Gram CM program, that has been described as the long march through the institutions. And unfortunately, our populace has not been fortified sufficiently to resist that siren song. You know, the script, the passage is in Colossians, you know, the apostle Paul writing to fortify the Colossian believers from being deluded. In that delusion, if gone unchecked, if allowed to proceed unchecked, metastasizes into full blown captivity. Right guys? If you wonder what that looks like, this is what it looks like. This is what it looks like that we have a generation and a half or a generation OR 2 From Mr. M. Gorbachev, tear down that wall, to where we now have, the most fervent portion of one major political party in our country, our outright socialists and outright Marxists. I remember saying some of these things, before I ever had a radio program, in NewSong Orleans. And people would look at me like I was crazy. Like, come on, abe Marxist, McCarthy, Abe, you, you m. Are you a McCarthyite? And I was like, Man, I'm not a McCarthy. And I just read. And when people show you and tell you who they are, you should believe them. And so from being mocked by saying, you realize they're Marxists in America to now, you have, I don't know, the Democratic socialists of America. Nobody's apologized though. You know, nobody say, you know, Abe, you were right about that. Nobody says that. Which, you know, I'm not looking for an apology. I want to be a part of the Lord's remnant, who is a, is invested in being salt and light in the time and place where God has planted us. And so I'm appealing to you to join the ranks of the Lord's remnant, first and foremost by placing your faith in Jesus Christ for eternal salvation. If you have not yet done so, today is the day of salvation. You look at the things that are transpiring around us. They confirm repeatedly the fact that the Bible is true. The Bible is true. And because the Bible is true, we should govern ourselves accordingly. Downstream from that reality is the fact that God has placed us, as Acts 17 explains, in this time, for this purpose, for his purposes. And so we have this moment before us, let's not miss our moment. To the word of God we go. Isaiah, chapter 26 is where I want to begin the program today. Isaiah, chapter 26. I want to focus in on verses three and four in the book of Isaiah. Isaiah, chapter 26, verses three and four. And this is a greatly encouraging source, of scripture, and I pray that you are encouraged by it as well. And this is what the text says. Verse 3, Isaiah 26, verse 3, the steadfast of mind. You notice the why there's capital capitalized in any SB95, the steadfast of mind. You will keep in perfect peace because he trusts in you. Trust in the Lord forever. For in God the Lord, we have an everlasting rock. We have an everlasting rock. That verse three, in many translations, King James, ESV and others, it renders that verse three, the beginning of it, as, This way you keep him in perfect peace whose mind is stayed on you. I'm presenting that to you because I'm keenly aware, you know, less than a week away now, we have midterm elections. I have stories I'm going to share with you. There are people who have just to cut right to the chase. Evil intentions for our nations. For our nation. Evil intentions. If you haven't seen the thing that Senator Alyssa Stotkin said, make sure I'm pronouncing her name right. That she said at the University of Chicago. Slotkin. I'm sorry? Slotkin. Elissa Slotkin. You know, because I'm on this program warmed. Yes, you have Islamists who have intentions. We talked earlier this week about the memorandum that was discovered in 2004. You there are Marxists. I already talked about them today. That have intentions. You know, we're going to mention, in the next segment. Flavio Bolsonaro fled Brazil, you know, and people forget, tend to forget that this dude is a member of the Brazilian Congress, but had to flee Brazil after the presidential election this week. Craziness. And we look at them and say, man, that's. Man, that's Banana Republic type stuff. But, wait, do you hear some of the things that are sitting U.S. senator just said? You know, it should perk your ears up to pay attention as to what's going on. But with all of that transpiring, what I said a few moments ago still remains to be true that God, knowing full well what was to come, appointed you and I to this time for this moment. And so we don't have to allow the swirling of the ridiculous. We don't have to allow the, you know, the consternations of the wicked. Like Psalms. Psalm 2 talks about the heathen conspiring together. You know, raging and conspiring and imagining a vain thing. We don't have to be fearful of that. We need to be sober minded. Sober minded. Steely, but most importantly, anchored in the truth of the king of glory. And this is what the scripture is discussing. The steadfast of mind, or as the King James renders it, you shall keep him in perfect peace. Whose mind is stayed.
Jenna Ellis You.
Abraham Hamilton III That word stayed or steadfast. And the translation that, I'm reading from comes from the Hebrew word that means to brace oneself, to lean upon in rest. You know, as I was preparing for the show, I got the image, if some of you remember the Lion King movie when. When Simba was just resting on Mufasa's head, you know, this is what the scripture is talking about. Resting in him. Not being ignorant as to what. What swirls around us. Not being, you know, ostrich, like with the head in the sand. No, we're keenly aware of what is happening. We simply know that the things that are happening are not bigger than our God, you see. And when the temptation arises to be, you know, whipped up into a frenzy and to be. To be drawn and to kind of shock jock into, you know, responsiveness. And what about this? And what about this? And what about this? You know, the spirit of God comes to remind us, remember. Remember who you are, but most importantly, remember whose you are. That's what this scripture is talking about. The steadfast of mine, the one who's braced in rest, the one who leans upon the reality of the transcendent splendor of our God. The scripture says he, our, God, Yahweh, will keep him in perfect peace. I love this construction in the Hebrew because it says shalom. Shalom. A lot of us are familiar with the concept of shalom, but this text renders basically double shalom that those who are stead, who have a steadfastness of mind, who are resting in the reality of who our God is. Our, God will keep them in perfect peace. Think about that. In the middle of the swirling, raging winds, the storms that surround us, the Lord reveals himself as the one who. Who will maintain us in shalom. Shalom. In the midst of it all. And I would say, I would submit to you that this is our portion and is available to us as we're facing these midterm elections. This is available to us as we are facing the ascendancy of the Hassan pikers in the dsa. It's available to us as we have an Abdul Sayed who refuses to denounce the Muslim Brotherhood when asked about Sharia law. Oh, nobody's worried about Sharia law. Really, bro? When you hear Alyssa Slotzkin's plans. No, no. This is the opportunity for us to maintain a steadfastness of mind in light of who our God is. And he in turn says in his word that he will keep us in perfect peace. Shalom. Shalom. Why? We don't have to guess. The scripture tells us why. Why? Because he trusts in you. Because he trusts in the Lord. The King. James says trust death. That eth means that the trust is not a visitation, but it's a habitation. It's a continual reality that there is no amount of swirling winds and raging storms and consternation and threats that can move us from the place of, steadfastness of mind and being preserved. And shalom. Shalom. Then it goes further. Why? Because you trust. Because we trust in the Lord forever. For in God the Lord, or as the legacy Bible says, where? For Yahweh himself. For in Yahweh himself, we have an everlasting rock. And I want to encourage you with the truth of this scripture this evening. We have an everlasting rock who's not subject to term limits, who is not on anybody's ballot, who is not limited to a composition of a parliament, is not limited, you know, to rank choice voting. We have an everlasting rock that we have the privilege of placing our trust in and having a steadfastness of mind. Steadfastness of mind. And as that is our continual disposition, the scripture says that we don't keep ourselves in perfect peace, that he will keep us in perfect peace. This is the privilege that you have as a believer that as the storms rage, to use the metaphor of a ship on a body of water, as the water rocks and rolls, that ship can move and sway. But we have an everlasting rock, so we don't have to be fearful. We can be reminded that we don't contend for victory, we contend from victory. It doesn't mean we don't do anything. But our doing is from the perspective of being preserved in shalom. Shalom, Perfect peace, completeness, soundness, including our welfare, as well as our internal disposition, being preserved spirit, soul and body in the face of what may come, that we still serve the King, who even causes fiery furnaces. Fiery furnaces. To be nullified if his three Hebrew young men are cast in and there's a fourth man in the fire who looks kind of like the Son of God that we serve, the God who shuts the mouths of lions. Even if a, Daniel is placed in a lion's den. Don't allow these things that are swirling around us, brothers and sisters, to encroach upon the reality of who we are in Christ, and more importantly, who Christ is. Because we have an everlasting rock who's not subjected to the temporal winds and waves of this culture. Hello, I'm, Abraham Hamilton iii. Did you know that this content is listener supported? Without people like you, this podcast would not exist. That's why we need you. A generous monthly gift of any amount will help sustain American Family Radio and specifically this podcast. Please consider becoming a monthly financial partner today by visiting afr.net that's afr.net give. Shining light into the darkness. This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio. Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner, Abraham Hamilton iii, the third here. So, as I mentioned in the first, segment, Flavio Balsanaro, the son of former Brazilian president, ah, Javier Bolsonaro, landed this morning in Miami after fleeing Brazil following the election there. And there's a reason why I'm sharing this, and I hope you see it as we go through it now sometimes. And I don't purport to be an expert in Brazilian electoral politics or anything like that, but it's easy to forget that Flavio Bolsonaro is a sitting senator in the Brazilian Congress. This would be the equivalent of a US Senator who is running for president, who loses the presidency, who has to flee the nation immediately following the election, the day after the election. Just to contextualize this, think about this. Think about Barack, Obama, who ran for president as a US senator from Illinois, and then he lost in the 2008 election, and then the day after the election he has to flee the United States of America. Think about that. That's what's happening in Brazil. And it's remarkable. Even it's remarkable. And of course President Trump has, Flavio Bolsonaro. Bolsonaro family are allies of President Trump. President Trump has said that the Brazilian election was a product of chicanery, you know, and many people following it have said the same thing because Flavio Bolsonaro defeated the incumbent president, what's his name? Lula. Lula. Lula. I'll just call him Lula Lula handily in the Initial election. In the initial round of the elections. So they had a subsequent round and all of a sudden, Lula gains an additional amount of votes that led to him having a 4.4 million vote margin over Bolsonaro. And again, I'm not an expert in Brazilian politics, but just doing a brief study of their elections. It never has happened to where the person who lost in the previous round of elections comes back and ends up defeating the candidate who won the first round of elections. Like that is an anomaly in the electoral process. Well, according to what has been reported on this matter, that the day after the election, the Brazilian Supreme Court approached Flavio Bolsonaro and demanded he surrender his passports. This is wild, guys. This is Banana Republic type stuff. This is Banana Republic type stuff. Demanded that he surrenders his passports. To which, you know, there are, there are contradictory reports here. Some are saying that, some are saying that he, surrendered his domestic and diplomatic passports, meaning his Brazilian passports, but he still had an Italian passport. Then others are saying he declined to surrender his passports. Either way, in response to the Supreme Court's request of his passport, Bolsonaro hightails it out of Brazil, going first to Argentina, where the Argentine President is, Javier Milei, who is also an ally of President Trump and an ally of the Bolsonaro family. And from Argentina to Ecuador. From Ecuador he landed by private charter plane in Miami. President Trump has granted, Flavio Bolsonaro and his family visas, apparently temporary visas. In light of this, what he perceives to be a, persecution effort, following the persecution effort that was imposed by the same court against Flavio Bolsonaro's father. You know, our sister Merle is in the chat, is explaining that in the first round of voting that Flavio Bolsonaro beat lula by over 10 million votes. Now all of a sudden he's down 4.4 million votes. I mean, I'm from, I'm from NewSong Orleans, near to the Gulf of America. I know what fish smell like. This is fishy. Listen to this brief clip. Listen to it and watch it. Reporting on the entire scenario that is unfolding from Brazil. It's clip number four. Clip four, go.
Jenna Ellis The plane carrying, Flavio Bolsonaro and his family touched down at Opelaka, executive here, just this morning. He and his family were granted visas by the US Government. Brazilian authorities say Bolsonaro and his wife and daughters fled Brazil to Argentina last night in a vehicle in what is said to have been a 19 or 20 hour drive. And then this morning they boarded that private plane to arrive here, in the Miami area. The Brazilian Supreme Court demanded they surrender their passports yesterday, but they refused. Again, this is all a day after the 45 year old senator and his family were granted US visas by the Trump administration. Overnight, President Trump said he approves of the Bolsonaro arriving in the US
Abraham Hamilton III As I mentioned, President Trump and the Bolsonaro family saying, man, listen, these people act up to the same shenanigans, guys. And this is, this is Banana Republic type stuff. This is Banana Republic type stuff. How do you go from being up 10 million votes in the first round of elections and then in the second round you're down by 4.4, nearly four and a half million votes. This is wild, man. This, this, this, this is wild. This is Banana Republic type stuff. Now I'm presenting this because that same type of activity really is the desire of people right here in our own country. The same types of activity. I'm not saying identically, but the same types of activity. Now why am I saying that? Well, a week ago, and I alluded to this earlier, but I'm going to go into the details now. Senator Elisa Slotkin from Michigan, she's a Democrat senator from Michigan appeared at the University of Chicago's Institute for Politics event. She was there to be interviewed by the VOX editorial director who's also a host of a show for vox. His name is Asted Herndon. All right. The University of Chicago was a predominantly regressive university. And so Elissa Slotkin felt comfortable, she felt relaxed to where I'm here among fellow travelers. And because the people here more than likely all agree with me, she didn't expect her comments to get out. Now, when you hear these comments, well, I'm just gonna let you hear the comments yourself from her. I will set up the context for you. because in her comments, Alyssa, Alyssa Slotkin shared what she hopes to accomplish after the midterm elections should the Democrats win a majority in the U.S. senate. And in her commentary, you're going to find, find that she said that we not only need to implement legal processes against President Trump, but we also need to make cases against others in his administration. Because she says, and I quote, I want young people coming out of school to say, should I go work for the Trump administration? That sounds fun. I might get an opportunity. I want them to be like, lord, that might be buying myself a ton of problems that I don't want. So let me avoid participating in that. I want that deterrence message sent. End quote. You see, Alyssa Slotkin, and I'm going to play it for you. Don't worry. Alissa Slotkin is saying that she wants to prosecute the types of cases that not only against the president, she wants to prosecute cases to people far downstream from the president so as to intimidate young Americans, people coming out of universities, people coming out of college, so that they would not consider participating in government if they happen to be conservative. Think about this. And in her words, she wants to execute these prosecutions not because a crime has been committed, not because there is evidence of criminality. No, no, no. She wants to do this. Why? Well, I'll quote her again. I want that deterrence message sent, end quote. She wants to deter young people from serving our country and governmental processes if they have a worldview that diverges from hers. I don't want you to take my word for it. I want you to listen to it for yourself. Listen to and watch Alissa Slotkin on stage at the University of Chicago's Institute of Politics just last week. Clip number one. Clip one, go.
Jenna Ellis So that's what I'm saying. I want to look at these signature cases and not just focus on the president, but on the people who enabled him. I want young people coming out of school to say, should I go work for the Trump administration? Like, that sounds fun. I might get an opportunity. I want them to be like, lord, that might be buying myself a ton of problems that I don't want. And so let me avoid participating in that. I want that deterrence message sent.
Abraham Hamilton III She wants that deterrence message sent. Didn't that sound a whole lot like, if you run for president and we don't like you, we going to demand your passport thereafter. Guys, this is Banana Republic type stuff. Now take into consideration what we witnessed during President Trump's first administration. Do you remember the lawfare? Do you remember the Mueller investigation? That was based on what? Do you remember the impeachment? That was based on what? Do you remember the litigation and the lawfare? Repeatedly, repeatedly, repeatedly. Do you remember how those connected to the Trump administration, how they were prosecuted and pursued? Do you. Do you remember this? And now you have Alyssa Slotkin saying, we want to ramp that up. We want to do it to such a degree that we want young people who would dare consider getting involved in public life, we want them to, be deterred from doing so because they don't want to deal with the legal problems that could flow from that. Should she get her preference in terms of the composition of our Congress following these midterm Elections. Now, of course, you can imagine, because remember, she's saying this at the University, of Chicago. She doesn't expect anybody there to have any problems with what she's saying. She didn't expect anybody there to kind of out what she's saying. But it just so happened you had a few conservative journalists who were in the room, and they were like, what did she just say? And that's how we got the video to disseminate publicly. Because, as you might imagine, Alissa Slotkin is saying, man, you know, you see, what happened was they didn't really get what I really meant. That, that. That wasn't what I really meant. You see, what I really meant. What I really meant is I'm talking about people who committed crimes. But Alyssa, Slotkin is, is, is. Is a woman who's very capable of communicating what she thinks. The problem with that defense and explanation is she didn't say that. It's been very easy for you to say, you know, for people who commit crimes. And once again, her comments themselves and the additional context for the comments show you what she truly meant. Because immediately following the statement she just made where she wanted to send that deterrence message, the hosted, Herndon says in response to what she's saying. Fair. Make them a pariah politically, socially, and maybe even legally. To which Alyssa Slotkin says she nods affirmatively, saying, yep, that's exactly what I mean. Let me show you. Listen to and watch. This is a short clip. Clip number two. Clip number two, go. You can make it a pariah politically, socially, maybe even legally. Even if that doesn't lead to the kind of high bar of impeachment. Did you hear that? So make them a pariah politically, socially, and maybe even legally. Even if you don't get to the high bar of impeachment, to which Alyssa Slotkin is just nodding her noggin. Yep, that's what I'm talking about. That's what I'm talking about. Now, why am I presenting this, guys? I'm pinning this next to what just happened in Brazil, because you don't have to guess what these people want to do. They are telling you. Elisabeth Slotkin, a US Senator, a sitting US Senator, is saying we need to identify signature cases. Not only the president. We need to get signature cases all the way down. Why do we need these signature cases, Alyssa Slotkin? Why? Because we're pursuing justice. Because there is evidence of criminality. Because there's things where legal accountability is necessary. No, that's not why Lisa Slotkin wants it she wanted. She told you why, quote, I want young people coming out of school to say, should I go work for the Trump administration? That sounds fun. I might get an opportunity, but I want them to be like, lord, that might be buying myself a ton of problems that I don't want. So let me avoid participating in that. I want that deterrence message sent, end quote. So if you want to know why they want to do these things, they want this deterrence message sent. Of course they oppose President Trump. Now, think about this. President Trump will be a lame duck president after the midterm elections. If you have a divided Congress, there's not much he can do domestically. But for Alyssa Slotkin, no, it's an opportunity to hinder President Trump as much as possible. But to send this deterrence message to cause young people to realize or to cause young people to think differently. Man, if I got a worldview that is not politically, in with the politically correct crowd, then I probably need to avoid participating, you know, because I could be opening myself up for a lot of problems to which I would ask, is that American? Is that consistent with the declaration of Independence? Is that consistent with us being the land of the free? Land of the free, Land of the free, Home of the brave? And I'm sharing this with you because I want you to see, not just from m somebody's opinion, not just my opinion, but this is what they intend to do. Do you want to allow these kind of people to have their way with a majority of influence in this instance in the U. S. Senate? Guys, this is despicable. This is despicable. She wants this deterrence message sent. I pray that her saying the quiet part out loud backfires big time. Backfires bigly so that people seeing, oh, that's what she wants to ah, nah, we're not letting that happen. We're not letting that happen. And respond otherwise. Guys, this is out of her own mouth. This is what she reveals about herself. Hello, my name is Andy Miller and I'm the president of Wesley biblical Seminary based in Ridgeland, Mississippi. We are developing trusted leaders for faithful churches and we do that based on the authority of scripture and in the reality that Christians can be transformed. We do that also through bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees. We'd love for you to learn more about Wesley Biblical Seminary at, ah, wbs.edu, where we're developing trusted leaders for faithful churches. the Hamilton quarter podcast and one minute commentaries are available at afr.net back to the Hamilton corner on American family radio. Welcome back to the Hamilton corner, Abraham Hamilton III here speaking of these elections. And it's just. Did y' all see the craziness in Alaska? So Alaska is one of the states where the Senate race is viewed to be pretty tight in some regards. Alaska, Michigan, I don't think Maine is in that anymore. Texas is being described in that way. Susan Collins is expected to win in Maine. But in Alaska, man, this is just wild. So Alaska is a state that has ranked choice voting, which is guys, that is frankly an abomination for electoral engagement. I mean they wait votes. You vote for several choices, you make your ranks and usually the person has the most second place votes ends up winning. You know, it's crazy the way they do ranked choice voting there. But in Alaska you have three people that are primarily in the November, third election. In November 3rd race, it is the incumbent, and I'm gonna say it this way intentionally, it's the incumbent, Republican U.S. senator Dan Sullivan. Then you have the former congresswoman, Democrat challenger Mary Poltola. Then you have currently, as I'm talking to you right now, formally identified as Republican now on the ticket as non affiliated. A non affiliated Dan Sullivan. I'm dead serious. Oh yeah, but see, you see the Dan Sullivan who is currently described as non affiliated is Dan J. Sullivan, whereas the incumbent Republican is Dan S. Sullivan. Surely you're not confused, are you? Dan Sullivan initially tried to run as a Republican as well, but due to a complaint filed with the state election officials in Alaska, he was disqualified from running as a Republican. And so he reasserted himself on the ballot as a, as an independent or in Alaska's terminology, non affiliated. Now again with the ranked choice voting in Alaska, it's amazing how he ends up on the Nov. 3 ballot because the Dan J. Sullivan who's now on the ballot received only 2 1/2% of the statewide vote in the August primary in Alaska. Only two and a half percent. Did you know that he's not affiliated? Now you see that's the non incumbent. Yeah, Dan, that's Dan S. See that's the whole point. That, see that's the whole point, Bobby, saying with Daniel J. Or Daniel S. Daniel S. Is the incumbent Republican. Dan J. Is unaffiliated guy, but he only got 2 1/2% of the vote in the primary. But according to Alaska law, that's enough for him to end up on the general election ballot in November. So what has happened now is that Elisa Rios, who was the former campaign manager and, and Longtime aid for Mary Patola has come out and said, oh, oh, Mary Patola is definitely aware of Dan J. Sullivan running for Senate. In fact, there are text messages indicating that she or her not, I won't say she, but her team. You look at me if you're watching the show, wink, wink. Her team was involved in recruiting Dan J. Sullivan to run for office. For the express purposes of confusing Alaska voters, some who might be inclined to vote for the incumbent, Dan S. Sullivan, to throw some votes towards Dan J. Sullivan in an effort to reduce the amount of votes that would go to the incumbent Republican to try to create a path for the Democrat challenger, Mary Patola to win in Alaska. I cannot make this stuff up. Cannot make this stuff up. Now of course, Mary Patola and her campaign have denied any awareness of, a recruitment effort to get someone on the ballot whose name just happens to be identical to the Republican incumbent. And the willing participant, Dan J. Sullivan, has said, oh no, nobody recruited me for the purposes of confusion. But guys, this is what's going on. So a lot of, a lot of the reasons behind the, ah, tightness of the race in Alaska, because you got two Dan Sullivan's on the ballot. Now of course, Alaskan voters need to read their ballots because the incumbent, Dan S. Sullivan is identified as the incumbent Republican senator on the ballot in Alaska. But just above his name is Dan J. Sullivan. Guys, this is, this is one of the, last people crying. This is ridiculous. And if you listen to me, Bobby and I are talking about this in the studio. Do you think that's going to confuse some Alaska voters? This is crazy, guys, but these are the kind of things that are happening. These are the kinds of things that are happening. so it's just wild. It's just wild what is happening there. And I want to mention something else because just yesterday, the parliamentary elections in Israel took place. And one of the things that some of us in America we don't realize is that Israel is a parliamentary system. So the citizens in Israel don't elect the Prime Minister directly. They cast votes for parties that would comprise their parliament and then the parliament elects the prime minister and the President. All right, Israel's parliament is, is the Knesset and it has 120 seats. In order to have the power to elect the Prime Minister and the president, the party needs to secure 61 seats in the Knesset. Historically, there's never been a party that has won a majority of Knesset seats. So usually the Prime Minister and the President are elected as a result of a coalition so you have one party, for example, like Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud Party. They will form a coalition with the next largest block of seats in the Knesset. And then they would agree to who they wanted to put in position as the Prime Minister and as the President. And Bibi Netanyahu is seeking to be to continue his stint as the longest serving prime minister in Israel's history. But one of the things I want to point out to you is that Israel is reporting 77.7% voter participation in this recent election. 77.7. Nearly 78% of the voting eligible Israel Israeli citizenry participated in this election. Do you know what the average participation is in our country for midterm elections? Participation usually hovers about 40%. Guys. That means 40% of voting eligible adults in the United States of America, Citizens of the United States of America. Only 40% participate in midterm elections. Guys. That's embarrassing. And even in presidential elections, which are far more popular in our country, do you realize the number of voting eligible American citizens that participate is usually it exceeds about 60%. And I understand in Israel there are existential things that are before them. October 7th. Hello. And this is the highest participation in the election that Israel has ever had. 77.7%. I'm sharing this data with you because I feel, as David articulated when Goliath was stomping in the shouting, is there not a cause? Is there not a cause? So we usually have about 60% of, of voting eligible Americans, adult citizens who completely express zero interest in the future ally of our country. Don't let that be you. And I know this audience is one of the most astute and engaged audiences. But share that, share those statistics with your friends, family and loved ones, because That's a shame. 40%. And oftentimes it's the low turnout that leads to people who should never be in office. You know, like, I don't know, people who take office in Congress under a false name. You know, Ilhan Omar. What's her real name? According to that? Her name is Ilhan Nur Syed Elmi. Really? A word that's you taking office on the false names. And then a whole part of this investigation is whether or not she was 17 or 18 years old when her father purportedly secured, naturalization in the United States of America. Because if she is 17, she would be naturalized as a result of his naturalization. But if she's 18 at the time. She was 18 at the time. Then she would have had to file paperwork on her own. Doesn't look like that's been done. And that's not even talking about her brother. Husband. Husband. Brother. You try to help him gain citizenship. I mean, it's. It's a whole big mess, man. It's a whole big mess. Last thing I mentioned. And this actually is worth far more attention than I'm about. I'm about to give it.
Jenna Ellis Now.
Abraham Hamilton III We'll maybe go into this a bit more tomorrow. but the U.S. department of Defense has announced the Fortress initiative. Department of War, I understand, but. But you do realize that that name has not been established congressionally. And unless. And unless Congress takes action on it, it will revert back to the Department of Defense following this term. Yeah. So anyway, the Department of War. Excuse me, has announced the Fortress initiative. And this is an initiative superintended under the authority of secretary of war Pete Hegseth. to cause military installations, including m. Military bases, domestically, exclusively. For now. They haven't said anything about international US Military bases, but domestic military bases, to be wartime ready to exist independent of civilian infrastructure for a minimum of 90 days. This is to have independent sources of electricity, water, food, fuel, communications, the whole nine yards. The way that this is being pursued is that they're seeking to implement the utilization of portable nuclear reactors. Portable nuclear reactors to power our bases especially and in light of potential domestic attacks. Listen to this brief clip from Secretary of war Pete Hegseth announcing the Fortress initiative. Clip number three. Clip three. Clip three. Go.
Jenna Ellis A new plan called Fortress preps military bases to keep forces operational in the event of a major attack that cripples power grids and other critical infrastructure.
Abraham Hamilton III If an adversary takes down the grid by cyber attack, by sabotage or by any means. Our bases stay lit, our aircraft keep flying, our command centers never go dark.
Jenna Ellis Each base would maintain its own off grid power supply along with big stockpiles of weapons and fuel to last for at least 90 days. Factories would switch to wartime weapons production and key military leaders would be moved to a secure complex at Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado.
Abraham Hamilton III Key points. Not only the 90 day independent functioning of the air bases, but also establishing a civil reserve manufacturing network that. That was authorized under the 2026 National Defense Authorization act that identifies civilian factories that could rapidly switch to defense production in a crisis. Now, this is clearly wise. Clearly wise. And it is a recognition that the previous thought that the two oceans, the Pacific and the Atlantic, would protect us from domestic attack by our enemies, whether they be cyber or otherwise. This is a recognition that that is no longer the case. Right. My question, however, is if this is what our Defense apparatus is seeking to do what should we do in the civilian infrastructure? This is why there should be a rapid pursuit for nuclear capabilities. And to have, I would argue, a diversification of energy sources, where you have primary sources and backup sources, so that in the event these things transpire, that our civilian populaces are prepared similarly, not identically, of course. We should never be because we're not the Department of War, the civilian structures. But should we recognize the threats as they are? This is an indication, an indication that our Defense Departments, our War Departments are. Are preparing for hostile actions on our own soil. My whole point in presenting this is that when you see preparations like this taking place, it should move you and I as individuals, as families, as the head of my family, to set preparation apparatuses in place in my own home, into my own sphere, within our own churches. Not doomsday, not trying to have this crazy bunker. But should we have some emergency preparedness? Should we have some things put in place for our family? Should we have some things available to us that we may be able to provide for our families and to aid our neighbors in the event that these things become necessary? This is not to cause any alarm whatsoever, but it's a prudence. It's a prudence that would allow you to be prepared. This is a wise move by our Department of War. I would argue. Wonder why it hadn't happened before now. Or has it already been happening? And because they're close to having it finished in many ways, that they're finally announcing it. That remains to be seen. But I thought it was important for you to be aware of this. That our military installations all across our domestic national presence is moving towards a capacity to be independent notice, they said, for at least 90 days. Pay attention to that at least, because I think you may very well see a, move towards our defense apparatuses being entirely independent, largely from civilian infrastructure. That will be a wise move. M The views and opinions expressed in
Jenna Ellis this broadcast may not necessarily reflect those of the American Family association or American Family Radio.
Abraham Hamilton III Darkness is not an affirmative force. It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light. This is the, Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio. It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite, delivering people out of the bondage of mainstream media and the philosophies of this world. God has called you and me to be his ambassadors, even in this dark moment. Let's not miss our moment. And now the Hamilton Corner. Good evening everybody. Welcome to the Hamilton Corner here on American Family Radio. I'm your host, Abraham Hamilton iii, joined by the corner contingent. Right across from me is my man, 100 grand, Mr. Bobby Roza. And in the screening room, produce extraordinaire. Often imitated, never duplicated. Y' all know what it is. It's the real J. Mac. Ladies and gentlemen. Not to be confused with the synthetic diet sucralose versions that Banti about, but the real deal. We're ready to rock and roll with today's edition of the program. At this very moment, many of you, if not most of you, are making your transition from your part time jobs where you generate an income, to your full time jobs where and through which you cultivate an outcome. And as you do so, I want to remind you to do so with intentionality. Being intentional about what you're going to do, having preceded, your engagement with prayer, having preceded it with planning, subjected to the lordship of Christ, of course, because what you do in your house is far more important than what goes on in the White House. And I say that with no intention whatsoever to denigrate or minimize the significance of what transpires at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. But I say it to emphasize the appropriate significance with which we should consider our engagements in our homes. If you look at the things that have transpired in our country, the retrenchments of the family correspond with the expansion of the Leviathan state. we see, the result of generations of ceding our children to an Antichrist. Frankly, government indoctrination complex has resulted in a populace that has a very hard time resisting, the fool's goal, that is a Marxist appeal, the fool's gold, that is, societal envy, you know, and covetousness. regardless of what is true, simply saying, well, somebody has that. Why can't I have that? To embrace kind of, not kind of, but to embrace an anti American ethos, that whatever issue is of concern or that may be of concern, the default response is look to the government for an answer. And that is not the American way, frankly. And it's not the biblical way. Government has its role, but it's very narrow and limited. But the capacity that we have as bearers of God's image is what, founded this nation with a biblical Protestant work ethic and understanding. that's just the truth of the history of this country. And what's happened over time is the execution of the Gram CM program, that has been described as the long march through the institutions. And unfortunately, our populace has not been fortified sufficiently to resist that siren song. You know, the script, the passage is in Colossians, you know, the apostle Paul writing to fortify the Colossian believers from being deluded. In that delusion, if gone unchecked, if allowed to proceed unchecked, metastasizes into full blown captivity. Right guys? If you wonder what that looks like, this is what it looks like. This is what it looks like that we have a generation and a half or a generation OR 2 From Mr. M. Gorbachev, tear down that wall, to where we now have, the most fervent portion of one major political party in our country, our outright socialists and outright Marxists. I remember saying some of these things, before I ever had a radio program, in NewSong Orleans. And people would look at me like I was crazy. Like, come on, abe Marxist, McCarthy, Abe, you, you m. Are you a McCarthyite? And I was like, Man, I'm not a McCarthy. And I just read. And when people show you and tell you who they are, you should believe them. And so from being mocked by saying, you realize they're Marxists in America to now, you have, I don't know, the Democratic socialists of America. Nobody's apologized though. You know, nobody say, you know, Abe, you were right about that. Nobody says that. Which, you know, I'm not looking for an apology. I want to be a part of the Lord's remnant, who is a, is invested in being salt and light in the time and place where God has planted us. And so I'm appealing to you to join the ranks of the Lord's remnant, first and foremost by placing your faith in Jesus Christ for eternal salvation. If you have not yet done so, today is the day of salvation. You look at the things that are transpiring around us. They confirm repeatedly the fact that the Bible is true. The Bible is true. And because the Bible is true, we should govern ourselves accordingly. Downstream from that reality is the fact that God has placed us, as Acts 17 explains, in this time, for this purpose, for his purposes. And so we have this moment before us, let's not miss our moment. To the word of God we go. Isaiah, chapter 26 is where I want to begin the program today. Isaiah, chapter 26. I want to focus in on verses three and four in the book of Isaiah. Isaiah, chapter 26, verses three and four. And this is a greatly encouraging source, of scripture, and I pray that you are encouraged by it as well. And this is what the text says. Verse 3, Isaiah 26, verse 3, the steadfast of mind. You notice the why there's capital capitalized in any SB95, the steadfast of mind. You will keep in perfect peace because he trusts in you. Trust in the Lord forever. For in God the Lord, we have an everlasting rock. We have an everlasting rock. That verse three, in many translations, King James, ESV and others, it renders that verse three, the beginning of it, as, This way you keep him in perfect peace whose mind is stayed on you. I'm presenting that to you because I'm keenly aware, you know, less than a week away now, we have midterm elections. I have stories I'm going to share with you. There are people who have just to cut right to the chase. Evil intentions for our nations. For our nation. Evil intentions. If you haven't seen the thing that Senator Alyssa Stotkin said, make sure I'm pronouncing her name right. That she said at the University of Chicago. Slotkin. I'm sorry? Slotkin. Elissa Slotkin. You know, because I'm on this program warmed. Yes, you have Islamists who have intentions. We talked earlier this week about the memorandum that was discovered in 2004. You there are Marxists. I already talked about them today. That have intentions. You know, we're going to mention, in the next segment. Flavio Bolsonaro fled Brazil, you know, and people forget, tend to forget that this dude is a member of the Brazilian Congress, but had to flee Brazil after the presidential election this week. Craziness. And we look at them and say, man, that's. Man, that's Banana Republic type stuff. But, wait, do you hear some of the things that are sitting U.S. senator just said? You know, it should perk your ears up to pay attention as to what's going on. But with all of that transpiring, what I said a few moments ago still remains to be true that God, knowing full well what was to come, appointed you and I to this time for this moment. And so we don't have to allow the swirling of the ridiculous. We don't have to allow the, you know, the consternations of the wicked. Like Psalms. Psalm 2 talks about the heathen conspiring together. You know, raging and conspiring and imagining a vain thing. We don't have to be fearful of that. We need to be sober minded. Sober minded. Steely, but most importantly, anchored in the truth of the king of glory. And this is what the scripture is discussing. The steadfast of mind, or as the King James renders it, you shall keep him in perfect peace. Whose mind is stayed.
Jenna Ellis You.
Abraham Hamilton III That word stayed or steadfast. And the translation that, I'm reading from comes from the Hebrew word that means to brace oneself, to lean upon in rest. You know, as I was preparing for the show, I got the image, if some of you remember the Lion King movie when. When Simba was just resting on Mufasa's head, you know, this is what the scripture is talking about. Resting in him. Not being ignorant as to what. What swirls around us. Not being, you know, ostrich, like with the head in the sand. No, we're keenly aware of what is happening. We simply know that the things that are happening are not bigger than our God, you see. And when the temptation arises to be, you know, whipped up into a frenzy and to be. To be drawn and to kind of shock jock into, you know, responsiveness. And what about this? And what about this? And what about this? You know, the spirit of God comes to remind us, remember. Remember who you are, but most importantly, remember whose you are. That's what this scripture is talking about. The steadfast of mine, the one who's braced in rest, the one who leans upon the reality of the transcendent splendor of our God. The scripture says he, our, God, Yahweh, will keep him in perfect peace. I love this construction in the Hebrew because it says shalom. Shalom. A lot of us are familiar with the concept of shalom, but this text renders basically double shalom that those who are stead, who have a steadfastness of mind, who are resting in the reality of who our God is. Our, God will keep them in perfect peace. Think about that. In the middle of the swirling, raging winds, the storms that surround us, the Lord reveals himself as the one who. Who will maintain us in shalom. Shalom. In the midst of it all. And I would say, I would submit to you that this is our portion and is available to us as we're facing these midterm elections. This is available to us as we are facing the ascendancy of the Hassan pikers in the dsa. It's available to us as we have an Abdul Sayed who refuses to denounce the Muslim Brotherhood when asked about Sharia law. Oh, nobody's worried about Sharia law. Really, bro? When you hear Alyssa Slotzkin's plans. No, no. This is the opportunity for us to maintain a steadfastness of mind in light of who our God is. And he in turn says in his word that he will keep us in perfect peace. Shalom. Shalom. Why? We don't have to guess. The scripture tells us why. Why? Because he trusts in you. Because he trusts in the Lord. The King. James says trust death. That eth means that the trust is not a visitation, but it's a habitation. It's a continual reality that there is no amount of swirling winds and raging storms and consternation and threats that can move us from the place of, steadfastness of mind and being preserved. And shalom. Shalom. Then it goes further. Why? Because you trust. Because we trust in the Lord forever. For in God the Lord, or as the legacy Bible says, where? For Yahweh himself. For in Yahweh himself, we have an everlasting rock. And I want to encourage you with the truth of this scripture this evening. We have an everlasting rock who's not subject to term limits, who is not on anybody's ballot, who is not limited to a composition of a parliament, is not limited, you know, to rank choice voting. We have an everlasting rock that we have the privilege of placing our trust in and having a steadfastness of mind. Steadfastness of mind. And as that is our continual disposition, the scripture says that we don't keep ourselves in perfect peace, that he will keep us in perfect peace. This is the privilege that you have as a believer that as the storms rage, to use the metaphor of a ship on a body of water, as the water rocks and rolls, that ship can move and sway. But we have an everlasting rock, so we don't have to be fearful. We can be reminded that we don't contend for victory, we contend from victory. It doesn't mean we don't do anything. But our doing is from the perspective of being preserved in shalom. Shalom, Perfect peace, completeness, soundness, including our welfare, as well as our internal disposition, being preserved spirit, soul and body in the face of what may come, that we still serve the King, who even causes fiery furnaces. Fiery furnaces. To be nullified if his three Hebrew young men are cast in and there's a fourth man in the fire who looks kind of like the Son of God that we serve, the God who shuts the mouths of lions. Even if a, Daniel is placed in a lion's den. Don't allow these things that are swirling around us, brothers and sisters, to encroach upon the reality of who we are in Christ, and more importantly, who Christ is. Because we have an everlasting rock who's not subjected to the temporal winds and waves of this culture. Hello, I'm, Abraham Hamilton iii. Did you know that this content is listener supported? Without people like you, this podcast would not exist. That's why we need you. A generous monthly gift of any amount will help sustain American Family Radio and specifically this podcast. Please consider becoming a monthly financial partner today by visiting afr.net that's afr.net give. Shining light into the darkness. This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio. Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner, Abraham Hamilton iii, the third here. So, as I mentioned in the first, segment, Flavio Balsanaro, the son of former Brazilian president, ah, Javier Bolsonaro, landed this morning in Miami after fleeing Brazil following the election there. And there's a reason why I'm sharing this, and I hope you see it as we go through it now sometimes. And I don't purport to be an expert in Brazilian electoral politics or anything like that, but it's easy to forget that Flavio Bolsonaro is a sitting senator in the Brazilian Congress. This would be the equivalent of a US Senator who is running for president, who loses the presidency, who has to flee the nation immediately following the election, the day after the election. Just to contextualize this, think about this. Think about Barack, Obama, who ran for president as a US senator from Illinois, and then he lost in the 2008 election, and then the day after the election he has to flee the United States of America. Think about that. That's what's happening in Brazil. And it's remarkable. Even it's remarkable. And of course President Trump has, Flavio Bolsonaro. Bolsonaro family are allies of President Trump. President Trump has said that the Brazilian election was a product of chicanery, you know, and many people following it have said the same thing because Flavio Bolsonaro defeated the incumbent president, what's his name? Lula. Lula. Lula. I'll just call him Lula Lula handily in the Initial election. In the initial round of the elections. So they had a subsequent round and all of a sudden, Lula gains an additional amount of votes that led to him having a 4.4 million vote margin over Bolsonaro. And again, I'm not an expert in Brazilian politics, but just doing a brief study of their elections. It never has happened to where the person who lost in the previous round of elections comes back and ends up defeating the candidate who won the first round of elections. Like that is an anomaly in the electoral process. Well, according to what has been reported on this matter, that the day after the election, the Brazilian Supreme Court approached Flavio Bolsonaro and demanded he surrender his passports. This is wild, guys. This is Banana Republic type stuff. This is Banana Republic type stuff. Demanded that he surrenders his passports. To which, you know, there are, there are contradictory reports here. Some are saying that, some are saying that he, surrendered his domestic and diplomatic passports, meaning his Brazilian passports, but he still had an Italian passport. Then others are saying he declined to surrender his passports. Either way, in response to the Supreme Court's request of his passport, Bolsonaro hightails it out of Brazil, going first to Argentina, where the Argentine President is, Javier Milei, who is also an ally of President Trump and an ally of the Bolsonaro family. And from Argentina to Ecuador. From Ecuador he landed by private charter plane in Miami. President Trump has granted, Flavio Bolsonaro and his family visas, apparently temporary visas. In light of this, what he perceives to be a, persecution effort, following the persecution effort that was imposed by the same court against Flavio Bolsonaro's father. You know, our sister Merle is in the chat, is explaining that in the first round of voting that Flavio Bolsonaro beat lula by over 10 million votes. Now all of a sudden he's down 4.4 million votes. I mean, I'm from, I'm from NewSong Orleans, near to the Gulf of America. I know what fish smell like. This is fishy. Listen to this brief clip. Listen to it and watch it. Reporting on the entire scenario that is unfolding from Brazil. It's clip number four. Clip four, go.
Jenna Ellis The plane carrying, Flavio Bolsonaro and his family touched down at Opelaka, executive here, just this morning. He and his family were granted visas by the US Government. Brazilian authorities say Bolsonaro and his wife and daughters fled Brazil to Argentina last night in a vehicle in what is said to have been a 19 or 20 hour drive. And then this morning they boarded that private plane to arrive here, in the Miami area. The Brazilian Supreme Court demanded they surrender their passports yesterday, but they refused. Again, this is all a day after the 45 year old senator and his family were granted US visas by the Trump administration. Overnight, President Trump said he approves of the Bolsonaro arriving in the US
Abraham Hamilton III As I mentioned, President Trump and the Bolsonaro family saying, man, listen, these people act up to the same shenanigans, guys. And this is, this is Banana Republic type stuff. This is Banana Republic type stuff. How do you go from being up 10 million votes in the first round of elections and then in the second round you're down by 4.4, nearly four and a half million votes. This is wild, man. This, this, this, this is wild. This is Banana Republic type stuff. Now I'm presenting this because that same type of activity really is the desire of people right here in our own country. The same types of activity. I'm not saying identically, but the same types of activity. Now why am I saying that? Well, a week ago, and I alluded to this earlier, but I'm going to go into the details now. Senator Elisa Slotkin from Michigan, she's a Democrat senator from Michigan appeared at the University of Chicago's Institute for Politics event. She was there to be interviewed by the VOX editorial director who's also a host of a show for vox. His name is Asted Herndon. All right. The University of Chicago was a predominantly regressive university. And so Elissa Slotkin felt comfortable, she felt relaxed to where I'm here among fellow travelers. And because the people here more than likely all agree with me, she didn't expect her comments to get out. Now, when you hear these comments, well, I'm just gonna let you hear the comments yourself from her. I will set up the context for you. because in her comments, Alyssa, Alyssa Slotkin shared what she hopes to accomplish after the midterm elections should the Democrats win a majority in the U.S. senate. And in her commentary, you're going to find, find that she said that we not only need to implement legal processes against President Trump, but we also need to make cases against others in his administration. Because she says, and I quote, I want young people coming out of school to say, should I go work for the Trump administration? That sounds fun. I might get an opportunity. I want them to be like, lord, that might be buying myself a ton of problems that I don't want. So let me avoid participating in that. I want that deterrence message sent. End quote. You see, Alyssa Slotkin, and I'm going to play it for you. Don't worry. Alissa Slotkin is saying that she wants to prosecute the types of cases that not only against the president, she wants to prosecute cases to people far downstream from the president so as to intimidate young Americans, people coming out of universities, people coming out of college, so that they would not consider participating in government if they happen to be conservative. Think about this. And in her words, she wants to execute these prosecutions not because a crime has been committed, not because there is evidence of criminality. No, no, no. She wants to do this. Why? Well, I'll quote her again. I want that deterrence message sent, end quote. She wants to deter young people from serving our country and governmental processes if they have a worldview that diverges from hers. I don't want you to take my word for it. I want you to listen to it for yourself. Listen to and watch Alissa Slotkin on stage at the University of Chicago's Institute of Politics just last week. Clip number one. Clip one, go.
Jenna Ellis So that's what I'm saying. I want to look at these signature cases and not just focus on the president, but on the people who enabled him. I want young people coming out of school to say, should I go work for the Trump administration? Like, that sounds fun. I might get an opportunity. I want them to be like, lord, that might be buying myself a ton of problems that I don't want. And so let me avoid participating in that. I want that deterrence message sent.
Abraham Hamilton III She wants that deterrence message sent. Didn't that sound a whole lot like, if you run for president and we don't like you, we going to demand your passport thereafter. Guys, this is Banana Republic type stuff. Now take into consideration what we witnessed during President Trump's first administration. Do you remember the lawfare? Do you remember the Mueller investigation? That was based on what? Do you remember the impeachment? That was based on what? Do you remember the litigation and the lawfare? Repeatedly, repeatedly, repeatedly. Do you remember how those connected to the Trump administration, how they were prosecuted and pursued? Do you. Do you remember this? And now you have Alyssa Slotkin saying, we want to ramp that up. We want to do it to such a degree that we want young people who would dare consider getting involved in public life, we want them to, be deterred from doing so because they don't want to deal with the legal problems that could flow from that. Should she get her preference in terms of the composition of our Congress following these midterm Elections. Now, of course, you can imagine, because remember, she's saying this at the University, of Chicago. She doesn't expect anybody there to have any problems with what she's saying. She didn't expect anybody there to kind of out what she's saying. But it just so happened you had a few conservative journalists who were in the room, and they were like, what did she just say? And that's how we got the video to disseminate publicly. Because, as you might imagine, Alissa Slotkin is saying, man, you know, you see, what happened was they didn't really get what I really meant. That, that. That wasn't what I really meant. You see, what I really meant. What I really meant is I'm talking about people who committed crimes. But Alyssa, Slotkin is, is, is. Is a woman who's very capable of communicating what she thinks. The problem with that defense and explanation is she didn't say that. It's been very easy for you to say, you know, for people who commit crimes. And once again, her comments themselves and the additional context for the comments show you what she truly meant. Because immediately following the statement she just made where she wanted to send that deterrence message, the hosted, Herndon says in response to what she's saying. Fair. Make them a pariah politically, socially, and maybe even legally. To which Alyssa Slotkin says she nods affirmatively, saying, yep, that's exactly what I mean. Let me show you. Listen to and watch. This is a short clip. Clip number two. Clip number two, go. You can make it a pariah politically, socially, maybe even legally. Even if that doesn't lead to the kind of high bar of impeachment. Did you hear that? So make them a pariah politically, socially, and maybe even legally. Even if you don't get to the high bar of impeachment, to which Alyssa Slotkin is just nodding her noggin. Yep, that's what I'm talking about. That's what I'm talking about. Now, why am I presenting this, guys? I'm pinning this next to what just happened in Brazil, because you don't have to guess what these people want to do. They are telling you. Elisabeth Slotkin, a US Senator, a sitting US Senator, is saying we need to identify signature cases. Not only the president. We need to get signature cases all the way down. Why do we need these signature cases, Alyssa Slotkin? Why? Because we're pursuing justice. Because there is evidence of criminality. Because there's things where legal accountability is necessary. No, that's not why Lisa Slotkin wants it she wanted. She told you why, quote, I want young people coming out of school to say, should I go work for the Trump administration? That sounds fun. I might get an opportunity, but I want them to be like, lord, that might be buying myself a ton of problems that I don't want. So let me avoid participating in that. I want that deterrence message sent, end quote. So if you want to know why they want to do these things, they want this deterrence message sent. Of course they oppose President Trump. Now, think about this. President Trump will be a lame duck president after the midterm elections. If you have a divided Congress, there's not much he can do domestically. But for Alyssa Slotkin, no, it's an opportunity to hinder President Trump as much as possible. But to send this deterrence message to cause young people to realize or to cause young people to think differently. Man, if I got a worldview that is not politically, in with the politically correct crowd, then I probably need to avoid participating, you know, because I could be opening myself up for a lot of problems to which I would ask, is that American? Is that consistent with the declaration of Independence? Is that consistent with us being the land of the free? Land of the free, Land of the free, Home of the brave? And I'm sharing this with you because I want you to see, not just from m somebody's opinion, not just my opinion, but this is what they intend to do. Do you want to allow these kind of people to have their way with a majority of influence in this instance in the U. S. Senate? Guys, this is despicable. This is despicable. She wants this deterrence message sent. I pray that her saying the quiet part out loud backfires big time. Backfires bigly so that people seeing, oh, that's what she wants to ah, nah, we're not letting that happen. We're not letting that happen. And respond otherwise. Guys, this is out of her own mouth. This is what she reveals about herself. Hello, my name is Andy Miller and I'm the president of Wesley biblical Seminary based in Ridgeland, Mississippi. We are developing trusted leaders for faithful churches and we do that based on the authority of scripture and in the reality that Christians can be transformed. We do that also through bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees. We'd love for you to learn more about Wesley Biblical Seminary at, ah, wbs.edu, where we're developing trusted leaders for faithful churches. the Hamilton quarter podcast and one minute commentaries are available at afr.net back to the Hamilton corner on American family radio. Welcome back to the Hamilton corner, Abraham Hamilton III here speaking of these elections. And it's just. Did y' all see the craziness in Alaska? So Alaska is one of the states where the Senate race is viewed to be pretty tight in some regards. Alaska, Michigan, I don't think Maine is in that anymore. Texas is being described in that way. Susan Collins is expected to win in Maine. But in Alaska, man, this is just wild. So Alaska is a state that has ranked choice voting, which is guys, that is frankly an abomination for electoral engagement. I mean they wait votes. You vote for several choices, you make your ranks and usually the person has the most second place votes ends up winning. You know, it's crazy the way they do ranked choice voting there. But in Alaska you have three people that are primarily in the November, third election. In November 3rd race, it is the incumbent, and I'm gonna say it this way intentionally, it's the incumbent, Republican U.S. senator Dan Sullivan. Then you have the former congresswoman, Democrat challenger Mary Poltola. Then you have currently, as I'm talking to you right now, formally identified as Republican now on the ticket as non affiliated. A non affiliated Dan Sullivan. I'm dead serious. Oh yeah, but see, you see the Dan Sullivan who is currently described as non affiliated is Dan J. Sullivan, whereas the incumbent Republican is Dan S. Sullivan. Surely you're not confused, are you? Dan Sullivan initially tried to run as a Republican as well, but due to a complaint filed with the state election officials in Alaska, he was disqualified from running as a Republican. And so he reasserted himself on the ballot as a, as an independent or in Alaska's terminology, non affiliated. Now again with the ranked choice voting in Alaska, it's amazing how he ends up on the Nov. 3 ballot because the Dan J. Sullivan who's now on the ballot received only 2 1/2% of the statewide vote in the August primary in Alaska. Only two and a half percent. Did you know that he's not affiliated? Now you see that's the non incumbent. Yeah, Dan, that's Dan S. See that's the whole point. That, see that's the whole point, Bobby, saying with Daniel J. Or Daniel S. Daniel S. Is the incumbent Republican. Dan J. Is unaffiliated guy, but he only got 2 1/2% of the vote in the primary. But according to Alaska law, that's enough for him to end up on the general election ballot in November. So what has happened now is that Elisa Rios, who was the former campaign manager and, and Longtime aid for Mary Patola has come out and said, oh, oh, Mary Patola is definitely aware of Dan J. Sullivan running for Senate. In fact, there are text messages indicating that she or her not, I won't say she, but her team. You look at me if you're watching the show, wink, wink. Her team was involved in recruiting Dan J. Sullivan to run for office. For the express purposes of confusing Alaska voters, some who might be inclined to vote for the incumbent, Dan S. Sullivan, to throw some votes towards Dan J. Sullivan in an effort to reduce the amount of votes that would go to the incumbent Republican to try to create a path for the Democrat challenger, Mary Patola to win in Alaska. I cannot make this stuff up. Cannot make this stuff up. Now of course, Mary Patola and her campaign have denied any awareness of, a recruitment effort to get someone on the ballot whose name just happens to be identical to the Republican incumbent. And the willing participant, Dan J. Sullivan, has said, oh no, nobody recruited me for the purposes of confusion. But guys, this is what's going on. So a lot of, a lot of the reasons behind the, ah, tightness of the race in Alaska, because you got two Dan Sullivan's on the ballot. Now of course, Alaskan voters need to read their ballots because the incumbent, Dan S. Sullivan is identified as the incumbent Republican senator on the ballot in Alaska. But just above his name is Dan J. Sullivan. Guys, this is, this is one of the, last people crying. This is ridiculous. And if you listen to me, Bobby and I are talking about this in the studio. Do you think that's going to confuse some Alaska voters? This is crazy, guys, but these are the kind of things that are happening. These are the kinds of things that are happening. so it's just wild. It's just wild what is happening there. And I want to mention something else because just yesterday, the parliamentary elections in Israel took place. And one of the things that some of us in America we don't realize is that Israel is a parliamentary system. So the citizens in Israel don't elect the Prime Minister directly. They cast votes for parties that would comprise their parliament and then the parliament elects the prime minister and the President. All right, Israel's parliament is, is the Knesset and it has 120 seats. In order to have the power to elect the Prime Minister and the president, the party needs to secure 61 seats in the Knesset. Historically, there's never been a party that has won a majority of Knesset seats. So usually the Prime Minister and the President are elected as a result of a coalition so you have one party, for example, like Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud Party. They will form a coalition with the next largest block of seats in the Knesset. And then they would agree to who they wanted to put in position as the Prime Minister and as the President. And Bibi Netanyahu is seeking to be to continue his stint as the longest serving prime minister in Israel's history. But one of the things I want to point out to you is that Israel is reporting 77.7% voter participation in this recent election. 77.7. Nearly 78% of the voting eligible Israel Israeli citizenry participated in this election. Do you know what the average participation is in our country for midterm elections? Participation usually hovers about 40%. Guys. That means 40% of voting eligible adults in the United States of America, Citizens of the United States of America. Only 40% participate in midterm elections. Guys. That's embarrassing. And even in presidential elections, which are far more popular in our country, do you realize the number of voting eligible American citizens that participate is usually it exceeds about 60%. And I understand in Israel there are existential things that are before them. October 7th. Hello. And this is the highest participation in the election that Israel has ever had. 77.7%. I'm sharing this data with you because I feel, as David articulated when Goliath was stomping in the shouting, is there not a cause? Is there not a cause? So we usually have about 60% of, of voting eligible Americans, adult citizens who completely express zero interest in the future ally of our country. Don't let that be you. And I know this audience is one of the most astute and engaged audiences. But share that, share those statistics with your friends, family and loved ones, because That's a shame. 40%. And oftentimes it's the low turnout that leads to people who should never be in office. You know, like, I don't know, people who take office in Congress under a false name. You know, Ilhan Omar. What's her real name? According to that? Her name is Ilhan Nur Syed Elmi. Really? A word that's you taking office on the false names. And then a whole part of this investigation is whether or not she was 17 or 18 years old when her father purportedly secured, naturalization in the United States of America. Because if she is 17, she would be naturalized as a result of his naturalization. But if she's 18 at the time. She was 18 at the time. Then she would have had to file paperwork on her own. Doesn't look like that's been done. And that's not even talking about her brother. Husband. Husband. Brother. You try to help him gain citizenship. I mean, it's. It's a whole big mess, man. It's a whole big mess. Last thing I mentioned. And this actually is worth far more attention than I'm about. I'm about to give it.
Jenna Ellis Now.
Abraham Hamilton III We'll maybe go into this a bit more tomorrow. but the U.S. department of Defense has announced the Fortress initiative. Department of War, I understand, but. But you do realize that that name has not been established congressionally. And unless. And unless Congress takes action on it, it will revert back to the Department of Defense following this term. Yeah. So anyway, the Department of War. Excuse me, has announced the Fortress initiative. And this is an initiative superintended under the authority of secretary of war Pete Hegseth. to cause military installations, including m. Military bases, domestically, exclusively. For now. They haven't said anything about international US Military bases, but domestic military bases, to be wartime ready to exist independent of civilian infrastructure for a minimum of 90 days. This is to have independent sources of electricity, water, food, fuel, communications, the whole nine yards. The way that this is being pursued is that they're seeking to implement the utilization of portable nuclear reactors. Portable nuclear reactors to power our bases especially and in light of potential domestic attacks. Listen to this brief clip from Secretary of war Pete Hegseth announcing the Fortress initiative. Clip number three. Clip three. Clip three. Go.
Jenna Ellis A new plan called Fortress preps military bases to keep forces operational in the event of a major attack that cripples power grids and other critical infrastructure.
Abraham Hamilton III If an adversary takes down the grid by cyber attack, by sabotage or by any means. Our bases stay lit, our aircraft keep flying, our command centers never go dark.
Jenna Ellis Each base would maintain its own off grid power supply along with big stockpiles of weapons and fuel to last for at least 90 days. Factories would switch to wartime weapons production and key military leaders would be moved to a secure complex at Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado.
Abraham Hamilton III Key points. Not only the 90 day independent functioning of the air bases, but also establishing a civil reserve manufacturing network that. That was authorized under the 2026 National Defense Authorization act that identifies civilian factories that could rapidly switch to defense production in a crisis. Now, this is clearly wise. Clearly wise. And it is a recognition that the previous thought that the two oceans, the Pacific and the Atlantic, would protect us from domestic attack by our enemies, whether they be cyber or otherwise. This is a recognition that that is no longer the case. Right. My question, however, is if this is what our Defense apparatus is seeking to do what should we do in the civilian infrastructure? This is why there should be a rapid pursuit for nuclear capabilities. And to have, I would argue, a diversification of energy sources, where you have primary sources and backup sources, so that in the event these things transpire, that our civilian populaces are prepared similarly, not identically, of course. We should never be because we're not the Department of War, the civilian structures. But should we recognize the threats as they are? This is an indication, an indication that our Defense Departments, our War Departments are. Are preparing for hostile actions on our own soil. My whole point in presenting this is that when you see preparations like this taking place, it should move you and I as individuals, as families, as the head of my family, to set preparation apparatuses in place in my own home, into my own sphere, within our own churches. Not doomsday, not trying to have this crazy bunker. But should we have some emergency preparedness? Should we have some things put in place for our family? Should we have some things available to us that we may be able to provide for our families and to aid our neighbors in the event that these things become necessary? This is not to cause any alarm whatsoever, but it's a prudence. It's a prudence that would allow you to be prepared. This is a wise move by our Department of War. I would argue. Wonder why it hadn't happened before now. Or has it already been happening? And because they're close to having it finished in many ways, that they're finally announcing it. That remains to be seen. But I thought it was important for you to be aware of this. That our military installations all across our domestic national presence is moving towards a capacity to be independent notice, they said, for at least 90 days. Pay attention to that at least, because I think you may very well see a, move towards our defense apparatuses being entirely independent, largely from civilian infrastructure. That will be a wise move. M The views and opinions expressed in
Jenna Ellis this broadcast may not necessarily reflect those of the American Family association or American Family Radio.
Join Abraham Hamilton III on The Hamilton Corner as he reflects on Isaiah 26:3–4 and the “perfect peace” God promises to those whose minds are steadfastly fixed on Him. Then, examine political developments in Brazil and the United States, including a senator’s call to use prosecutions as a deterrent, concerns over Alaska’s ranked-choice voting, and voter turnout in Israel. Plus, hear why the Pentagon’s Fortress initiative is prompting a conversation about prudent preparedness at home and in our communities.
Live
Did you know American Family Radio is listener-supported? Your monthly financial support will allow us to continue upholding Godly values through our numerous channels, like American Family Radio, One Million Moms, The Stand magazine, and many more.
Become a Great Commission Partner TODAY to help AFR transform culture by rebuilding the family. When you donate today, you’ll get access to:
